LCRO 130/2018 UH v OB (12 February 2020) [pdf, 165 KB]
...fact, some of his evidence before the Tribunal was not truthful and [Mr OB] became concerned that Mr UH was getting close to perjuring himself. [11] He advises that he drew in another barrister to assist him, particularly with the most complex matter involving Mr and Mrs NR and that Mr UH departed from his brief of evidence. The Tribunal specifically noted that Mr UH had attempted to deceive it, and gave false evidence under oath. [12] Mr OB concludes:5 Mr UH was found to be a dis...