Search Results

1. Hutcheson v Houkamau - Porangahau 2B No 10 (2021) 88 Takitimu MB 118 (88 TKT 118) [pdf, 581 KB]

   ...Māori Land Court of New Zealand Tākitimu District A20180005757 WĀHANGA Under Regulation 21, Māori Reservation Regulations 1994 Sections 37, 236, 237, 238, 239 and 240, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Porangahau 2B No 10 and Other Blocks (Rongomaraeroa Marae) I WAENGA I A Between AIMEE WHAITIRI HUTCHESON, NICHOLAS REIHANA SCIASCIA, RENEE KAHURANGI SCIASCIA AND WIKITORIA BROWN Ngā Kaitono Applicants...

2. Recommendations recap - issue 1 [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   Recommendations Recap A summary of coronial recommendations and comments made between 1 October–31 December 2011 ISSUE 1 O F N E W Z E A L A N D CHIEF CORONER O F F I C E O F T H E http://www.justice.govt.nz/courts/coroners-court/ Coronial Services of New Zealand Purongo O te Ao Kakarauri justice.govt.nz/coroners To request a copy of any full findings of cases contained in this edition, please contact our National Office. National Office Coronial.Information@justice.govt...

3. [2019] NZEmpC 113 Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories Ltd v Scott [pdf, 576 KB]

   ...TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES LIMITED v BRENDON SCOTT [2019] NZEmpC 113 [30 August 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2019] NZEmpC 113 EMPC 274/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for a stay of execution BETWEEN GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES LIMITED Plaintiff...

4. [2023] NZEnvC 226 Scaife v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   SCAIFE v QLDC – TOPIC 38 – INTERIM DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 226 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN M SCAIFE (ENV-2021-CHC-022) Appellant AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Environment Commissioner J T Baines Hearing: at Queenstown...

5. LCRO 20/2020 WD and FJ v EG, SN and PL (7 April 2022) [pdf, 354 KB]

   ...conveyancing transaction were followed, and how subsequent concerns about the management of that transaction were dealt with. [5] That brief description is not to be taken as trivialising the complaint and review application. I acknowledge that the matters raised by the complainants have been a source of real distress to them which continues to this day, some four to five years after the events themselves. [6] That being said, I also acknowledge that, for the practitioners, the dis...

6. Criminal Fixed Fee schedules 2017 [pdf, 737 KB]

   ................................................................... 23 GRANTING NOTES FOR SCHEDULES G, H & I ........................................................................................................ 25 SCHEDULE J: FEE SCHEDULE FOR PAROLE (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ....................................................................... 26 GRANTING NOTES FOR SCHEDULE J ......................................................................................................................

7. Criminal fixed fee schedules 2017 [pdf, 883 KB]

   ................................................................... 23 GRANTING NOTES FOR SCHEDULES G, H & I ........................................................................................................ 25 SCHEDULE J: FEE SCHEDULE FOR PAROLE (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ....................................................................... 26 GRANTING NOTES FOR SCHEDULE J ......................................................................................................................

8. Ngāti Pāoa Whānau Trust v Hauraki Māori Trust Board (1995) 96A Hauraki MB 155 (96A H 155) [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...most appropriate representatives of any class or group of Maori affected by thoseproceedings; and (b) At the request of the ChiefExecutive or the ChiefJUdge. determine, in relation to any negotiations. consultations, allocation of funding. or other matter, the persons who, for the purposes of the negotiations, consultations. allocation, or other matter. are the most appropriate representatives of any class or group of Maori affected by the negotiations. consultations, allocation. or othermatte...

9. Wall v Fairfax New Zealand Ltd [2017] NZHRRT 17 [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...the racial disharmony provisions of s 61 of the HRA. THE PLAINTIFF’S CASE [28] The provisions of s 61 of the HRA applicable to the circumstances of the present case make it unlawful for any person to (inter alia) publish or distribute written matter which is “threatening, abusive or insulting”, being matter “likely to excite hostility against or bring into contempt any group of persons in New Zealand on the ground of the colour, race, or ethnic or national origins of that group...

10. NH v Singh LCRO 53/2013, 91/2013 and 115/2013 (27 August 2014) [pdf, 95 KB]

    ...the [Area] Standards Committee BETWEEN AND MR NH DHIRENDRA (SHEAN) SINGH Except for the Respondent the names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed DECISION Introduction [1] When the subject matter of Mr NH’s complaint arose, Mr Singh, who is a lawyer and sole principal of EFG Firm, was also a: (a) Beneficiary of XYZ Trust, a trust settled and administered by his brother, and another trustee.1 (b) Director and shareholder...