LCRO 183/2020 DX v SQ (26 February 2021) [pdf, 260 KB]
...affidavit in YX’s and RX’s proceedings against Mr DX, but the Committee had not been provided with a copy of either the proceedings, or the Court’s decision. [29] In conclusion, the Committee stated it had no jurisdiction in respect of any matter before the Court. However, if arising out of those proceedings the Court found Ms SQ had, when representing YX and RX, “acted improperly”, Mr DX could make another complaint to the LCS about Ms SQ at that time. Application for...