Search Results

Search results for justice matters.

8473 items matching your search terms

  1. LCRO 183/2020 DX v SQ (26 February 2021) [pdf, 260 KB]

    ...affidavit in YX’s and RX’s proceedings against Mr DX, but the Committee had not been provided with a copy of either the proceedings, or the Court’s decision. [29] In conclusion, the Committee stated it had no jurisdiction in respect of any matter before the Court. However, if arising out of those proceedings the Court found Ms SQ had, when representing YX and RX, “acted improperly”, Mr DX could make another complaint to the LCS about Ms SQ at that time. Application for...

  2. Privacy Bill - Regulatory Impact Statement - additional policy decisions [pdf, 502 KB]

    Impact Statement Template | 1 Coversheet: Additional policy approvals for the Privacy Bill Advising agencies The Ministry of Justice Decision sought Agreement to progress changes to the Privacy Bill to: 1. amend the threshold for mandatory notification of a privacy breach, so that agencies must notify breaches where the breach is likely to cause serious harm 2. clarify the Bill’s application to agencies based overseas and information held overseas 3. expand the def...

  3. DairyNZ Limited [pdf, 427 KB]

    ...I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 IN THE MATTER of an appeal under clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991 against the decision of the Waikato Regional Council on Waikato Regional Plan Proposed Plan Change 1: Waikato and Waipa River catchments...

  4. E v IAG New Zealand Ltd (3rd decision – quantum) [2019] CEIT-2019-0013 [pdf, 596 KB]

    1 IN THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL CEIT-0013-2019 IN THE MATTER OF CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL ACT 2019 BETWEEN PFWE AND JEE Applicant AND IAG NEW ZEALAND LIMITED First Respondent AND AND INTERNATIONAL STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT NEW ZEALAND LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) Second Respondent QBE INSURANCE (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED (REMOVED) Third Respondent AND...

  5. Director of Proceedings v Taranaki District Health Board [2021] NZHRRT 49 [pdf, 613 KB]

    ...REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2021] NZHRRT 49 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [1] These proceedings under the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 were filed on 31 March 2021. [2] Prior to the filing of the proceedings the parties resolved all matters in issue and the Tribunal is asked to make orders by consent. The parties have filed: [2.1] A Consent Memorandum dated 31 March 2021; [2.2] An Agreed Summary of Facts, a copy of which is annexed and marked ‘A’; [2.3] A joint memo...

  6. Waters v Alpine Energy Ltd (Adjournment Application) [2015] NZHRRT 17 [pdf, 59 KB]

    ...witness statement or by a “will say” statement to enable the Tribunal or Chairperson to be satisfied there are proper grounds for the issue of the summons and to prevent abuse or wrongful use of the summons. The discretion notwithstanding, natural justice and a fair hearing require that a party should have every reasonable opportunity to present evidence in support of his or her case. See Chee v Stareast Investment Ltd HC Auckland CIV-2009-404-005255, 1 April 2010 (Wylie J) at [60]:...

  7. Regulatory Impact Statement Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 regulations [pdf, 211 KB]

    REGULATORY IMPACT STATEMENT – PRIVATE SECURITY PERSONNEL AND PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS ACT 2010 - REGULATIONS 1 AGENCY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT This Regulatory Impact Statement was prepared by the Ministry of Justice. It provides an analysis of options for mandatory training for three categories of security personnel regulated under the Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010. In November 2009, the Government confirmed the former Government’s decision that c

  8. [2022] NZEmpC 36 Kang v Saena Company Ltd [pdf, 231 KB]

    HUNMO KANG v SAENA COMPANY LIMITED [2022] NZEmpC 36 [8 March 2022] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2022] NZEmpC 36 EMPC 60/2022 IN THE MATTER OF an application for freezing and ancillary orders BETWEEN HUNMO KANG Applicant AND SAENA COMPANY LIMITED First Respondent AND NABORN COMPANY LIMITED Second Respondent AND GYU ILL HWANG Third Responden...

  9. [2006] NZEmpC AC 49/06 National Distribution Union & Anor v General Distributors & Anor [pdf, 59 KB]

    NATIONAL DISTRIBUTION UNION And Anor V GENERAL DISTRIBUTORS LIMITED And Anor AK AC 49/06 [4 September 2006] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 49/06 ARC 58/06 IN THE MATTER OF an application for interim injunction BETWEEN NATIONAL DISTRIBUTION UNION First Plaintiff AND NZ AMALGAMATED ENGINEERING PRINTING AND MANUFACTURING UNION Second Plaintiff AND GENERAL DISTRIBUTORS LIMITED First Defendant AND THE SUPPLY CHAIN LIMITED Second Defendant Heari...

  10. BORA Psychoactive Substances Bill [pdf, 334 KB]

    ...proven, the substance or product will be returned.[21] 15. Seizure of substances and products pending the determination of criminal charges serves the legitimate law enforcement objective of ensuring that evidence is available for the criminal justice process. Forfeiture of such substances and products in circumstances where offences have been proven is reasonable. Provision of identifying information 16. The Bill provides that certain persons will be required to provide pol...