8472 items matching your search terms
[2020] NZSSAA 4 Reference No. SAA 26/17 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 2018 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of Auckland against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee DECISION Background [1] In 1993 XXXX and his wife went to Singapore as missionaries, where they lived and worked for about 19 years. After packing up and leaving
IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND AND ENV-2016-AKL- of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (LGATPA) and the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) of an appeal under section 156(3) of the LGATPA against a decision of the Auckland Council on a recommendation of the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel (Hearings Panel) on the proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (Proposed Pl...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 88 ACR 198/21 and 217/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN C POL Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 21 April 2022 Held at: Auckland/Tāmaki Makaurau Appearances: The appellant was self-represented F Becroft for the respondent...
...[22] Mr NE issued his invoice dated 9 September 2015 for his fee of $25,000. [23] Her Honour delivered a reserved decision dated [date] 2015 dismissing Mr ET’s application on the basis that, for various reasons, it was not in the interests of justice to grant him leave to appeal. [24] Mr NE’s fee was not paid. [25] Mr OC and Mr ET corresponded, and in December 2015 Mr ET made a complaint to the New Zealand Law Society (NZLS) about Mr NE’s fee and the service he had provided...
...undertakings despite the fact that this was in direct contravention of clause 35 of the trust deed of the [Trust A] and of the no-charging provision contained in the section 21 agreement) the settlement of the [Trust A] and section 21 agreement both being matters in respect of which the practitioners had acted); • that the practitioners had clear conflicts of interest to the extent that they acted for Ms KJ in respect of the section 21 agreement, were solicitors acting for Ms KJ as s...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 180 ACR 304/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT UNDER SECTION 162 OF THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT BETWEEN LESLEY NORMAN AUSTIN Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: Mr G J Thwaite for the Applicant Ms...
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2022] NZLCDT 7 LCDT 017/21 and 018/21 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN NELSON STANDARDS COMMITTEE Applicant AND GRAEME MARK DOWNING AND ALEXANDER ALAN REITH Practitioner CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr F Pereira MNZM Ms G Phipps Mr T Mackenzie Dr D Tulloch HEARING 16 December 2021 HELD AT Tribunals Unit, Well...
E TŪ INCORPORATED v RASIER OPERATIONS BV [2022] NZEmpC 192 [25 October 2022] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZEmpC 192 EMPC 230/2021 IN THE MATTER OF a declaration under s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 BETWEEN E TŪ INCORPORATED First Plaintiff AND FIRST UNION INCORPORATED Second Plaintiff AND RASIER OPERATIONS BV First Defendant AND UBER PORTIER BV Second Defendant AND UBER BV...
...summarised “the reasonable fee factors in r 9.1” to be taken into account when determining the fee. 5 In the Committee’s view Mr WQ’s, and Ms QZ’s time recorded of 16.8 hours “was consistent with the time … expected” on the matter and was “reasonable”. This was despite Mr WQ’s position, disputed by Mr VR, that the absence of a real estate agent “increased legal costs”.2 (b) Skill, specialised knowledge, and responsibility - r 9.1(b) In the Committ...
...Electoral Review Final Report | Executive Summary 13 He Arotake Pōtitanga Motuhake Independent Electoral Review Executive Summary Background 1. We were established as an independent panel in May 2022 by the Minister of Justice to review Aotearoa New Zealand’s electoral system. Our Terms of Reference cover almost everything to do with how our elections work.1 2. We approached our task independently and with open minds. Taking a principled approach, we c...