8472 items matching your search terms
...LIMITED AND GEORGE ALLEN CHAMBERS v FLORIAN PELABON [2019] NZEmpC 45 [18 April 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2019] NZEmpC 45 EMPC 176/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN ALLEN CHAMBERS LIMITED AND GEORGE ALLEN CHAMBERS Plaintiffs AND FLORIAN PELABON Defendant Hearing: 18 Febr...
Minute Book: 168 GIS 103 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAIRAWHITI DISTRICT A20050009419 UNDER Section 22, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 Hearing: IN THE MATTER OF Wharekahika A47 14 December 2005 (Heard at Gisbome) JIM KURURANGI Applicant Appearances: Gordon Webb - Counsel for the Trustees Ron Barber - Counsel for Applicant T Collier for Maori Trustee Judgment: 15 September 2006 JUDGMENT OF .ruDGE C L FOX Introduction [1] On 1 April 2000, Mr Jim Kururangi...
74 Waikato Maniapoto MB 277 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIKATO MANIAPOTO DISTRICT A20130001982 UNDER Section 237 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Te Reti B and Te Reti C Block BETWEEN STANLEY JAMES URWIN, WILLIAM HAURUIA NEPIA, PHILSON TUMATAWHA PIAHANA, RANGINUI WINIATA, CHRISTOPHER HAURUIA NEPIA, MICHELLE TURNER and KINGI JUNIOR TE REOHAU RANUI as Trustees of the Te Reti B and C Block Applicant AND R...
2016 Chief Judge’s MB 34 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIĀRIKI DISTRICT A20070012873 CJ 2007/62 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Torere Pa 1B6 Hatu Whakamamaeroa Charles Herewini Applicant Hearing: 16 July 2013 at 2013 Chief Judge's MB 642-653 (Heard at Rotorua) Judgment: 01 February 2016 DECISION OF CHIEF JUDGE W W ISAAC
140 Waikato Maniapoto MB 83 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIKATO MANIAPOTO DISTRICT A20150003022 UNDER Section 18 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF An application for a claim for money BETWEEN RAMONA LEE Applicant AND MANGAPAPA B2 INCORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 6 April 2017 (Heard at Hamilton) Appearances: Mr J A Hope, Counsel for the applicant Mrs R P Mullins, Counsel for the respondent...
Before the Environment Court In the matter of And In the matter of And In the matter of Between And ENV-2016-AKl the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (LGATPA) and the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) an appeal under s 156(1) of the LGATPA against a decision of the Auckland Council on a recommendation of the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel (Hearings Panel) on the proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (Unitary Plan) Proposed Plan...
...on an outcome and that without admitting liability, Kelly Services had made an offer of settlement: Following yesterday’s mediation meeting, your complaints of sexual harassment and victimisation were not resolved. Both parties discussed the matters fully. However, despite each party having heard each other’s perspectives, there was no agreement regarding the facts. Proposals were put forward by each party for closure of the matter. You stated that an offer of employment by Kell...
...available under the Act. Mrs EA’s lawyer’s fees totalled $5,321.20 at the time of her application for review. She considers Ms NR should also pay those, and “whatever subsequent costs” Mrs EA incurs, “prior to finalisation of these matters”. Mrs EA also wishes to be consulted on the details that would be disclosed if this decision were to be published. [27] Mrs EA said she did not consider $5,000 was sufficient to adequately compensate her and her husband for the br...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2013] NZREADT 68 READT 073/12 and 082/12 IN THE MATTER OF two appeals under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN JOHN REID (073/12) Appellant AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC20002 ) First respondent AND DANIEL COX Second respondent BETWEEN DANIEL COX (082/12) Appellant AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 20002) First respondent AND JOHN REID Secon...
...did so on 9 July 2022. [22] HC’s response was comprehensive. A significant component of her response provided background to the circumstances which had culminated in the employment dispute. [23] To the extent that HC’s reply addressed matters specifically relating to the Standards Committee decision and the review application filed, HC submitted that: (a) on first seeking advice from BG, she had been assured by BG that she had strong prospect of a satisfactory outcome; and...