8472 items matching your search terms
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2019] NZREADT 52 READT 051/17 IN THE MATTER OF Charges laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BROUGHT BY COMPLAINTS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE 412 AGAINST GURPREET GREWAL Defendant Hearing: 19 November 2019, at Auckland Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews, Chairperson Mr G Denley, Member Ms C Sandelin, Member Appearances: Mr M Mortimer, on behalf of the...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2021] NZREADT 04 READT 004/20 IN THE MATTER OF charges laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BROUGHT BY COMPLAINTS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE 409 AGAINST WAYNE KEMP First Defendant AND MARINA SCOBLE Second Defendant Hearing 8 December 2020, at Wellington Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews, Chairperson Ms C Sandelin, Member Mr N O’Connor, Member...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I MUA I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Kl OTAUTAHI IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 142 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an application for declarations under s 310 of the Act ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE SOCIETY INCORPORATED (ENV-2020-CHC-99) Applicant NEW ZEALAND ALUMINIUM SMELTERS LIMITED Respondent Court: Environment Judge J E Borthwick (Sitting alone pursuant to s 279 of the Act) Hearing: In C...
FINAU AND ORS V SOUTHWARD ENGINEERING CO LTD WN WC 17/07 25 July 2007 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON WC 17/07 WRC 28/06 IN THE MATTER OF the referral of a question of law from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN KEN FINAU OKA MAIAVA MARK REYNARD NIKO ALOISIO CHRISTOPHER DOWNS LYLE SMITH LEON MAKARA Applicants AND SOUTHWARD ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED Respondent Hearing: 16 November 2006 (Heard at Wellington) Court: Judge G L Colgan Ju...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2014] NZREADT 71 READT 018/14 IN THE MATTER OF a charge laid under s.91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN COMPLAINTS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE 20003 Prosecutor AND MARK STEPHEN FOURIE (LICENSEE) Defendant MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Mr J Gaukrodger - Member Ms C Sandelin - Member HEARD at PUKEKOHE on 13 August 2014 DATE OF THIS DECISION 18 September 2014 C...
SHAKES & ANOR V NORSKE SKOG TASMAN LTD AK AC 11/08 1 May 2008 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 11/08 ARC 63/07 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN NEVILLE LLOYD SHAKES First Plaintiff AND MALCOLM STEWART HELYAR Second Plaintiff AND NORSKE SKOG TASMAN LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 21 April 2008 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: LJ Yukich, Advocate for Plaintiffs Richard McIlraith and K...
K Vernon, Notice of Appeal, Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan Page 1 of 11 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV-2016-AKL- IN THE MATTER of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (LGATPA) and the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal under section 156 of the LGATPA against a decision of the Auckland Council on a recommendation of the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel (Hearings Panel) on the proposed Auckla...
TANGIANAU HERE V MCALPINE HUSSMAN LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2012] NZEmpC 204 [6 December 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 204 ARC 24/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN TANGIANAU HERE Plaintiff AND MCALPINE HUSSMAN LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 7 September and 15 November 2012 (Heard at Auckland) Counsel: Mr G Bennett, advocate for plaintiff Mr R Towner and Ms D Doak,...
SMITH V LIFE TO THE MAX HOROWHENUA TRUST WN 15 November 2010 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2010] NZEMPC 152 WRC 8/10 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN MARGARET SMITH Plaintiff AND LIFE TO THE MAX HOROWHENUA TRUST Defendant Hearing: 22 September 2010 30 September 2010 Appearances: Geoff O'Sullivan and Nikki Flint, Counsel for the Plaintiff Phillip Drummond, Counsel for the Defend...
...Māori individuals, the Samoan community and young people impacted by adoption, as we were aware it would be difficult to identify people with experience of adoption within these groups, and people may not be comfortable talking directly to Ministry of Justice officials. 4. The feedback we received falls into two groups: a. feedback on broad themes relating to adoption – feedback that took a wider view than the questions set out in the discussion document and either addressed matters...