LCRO 76/2018 HS v WA (19 February 2019) [pdf, 175 KB]
...gave Mr WA no reason to believe otherwise at the time. [38] There is no reason to believe Mr WA exerted any pressure on Mr HS to sign, and every reason to believe Mr HS freely signed, even if he was in something of a rush and busy with other matters. If Mr HS did not notice the absence of the $50,000, and therefore did not draw that to Mr WA’s attention, it is difficult to see how Mr WA could be held to account for that. 9 [39] The second point is that the 2013 agreement...