8456 items matching your search terms
CLAIM NO: 2171 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN AVIS COOPER Claimant AND WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL First Respondent AND R & I KENNEDY LIMITED Second Respondent AND R TE ONE ASSOCIATES LIMITED Third Respondent AND No Fourth Respondent Master Build Services Limited having been struck out AND TREVOR GASKIN Fifth Respondent AND No Sixth Respondent CSR Building...
- Review of the AML/CFT Act Consultation Document Ministry of Justice October 2021 Important notice The opinions contained in this document are those of the Ministry of Justice and do not reflect official government policy. Readers are advised to seek specific legal advice from a qualified professional person before undertaking any action in reliance on the contents of this publication. The contents of this discussion document must not be con...
...APPELLANT’S NAME AND ANY DETAILS THAT MIGHT IDENTIFY THE APPELLANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 11 ACR 291/18 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT BETWEEN KI Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 20 November 2023 Heard at: Wellington / Whanganui-A-Tara...
Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage NZ IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2021] NZEnvC 165 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 58 of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 BETWEEN POUTAMA KAITIAKI CHARITABLE TRUST (ENV-2020-AKL-158) Appellant AND HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA Respondent AND FIRST GAS LIMITED Section 274 Party Court: Environment Judge MJL Dickey Māori Land...
...other parties; and (ii) all lawyers (if any) representing those other parties; and (iii) all members of the public. 4 (3) However, the Tribunal may only exercise the powers in subsection (2) if it is necessary to do so to avoid compromising the matters that the agency considers justify refusing access to the personal information. [6] The procedure was fully explained to Mr Beattie at the case management teleconference held on 15 February 2018 and in the Chairperson’s more recent...
...is not to apportion blame as no one meant this to happen, but it is to try and help prevent another tragedy. The authorities in charge of the area have taken significant steps with signage and blocking access. II. In the Court’s view, matters could go further with more explicit signage, consideration to trying to have swimming prohibited and making that very clear. III. Also, there could be a physical check of the area before water is released and the use of a drone...
Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage NZ IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2021] NZEnvC 165 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 58 of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 BETWEEN POUTAMA KAITIAKI CHARITABLE TRUST (ENV-2020-AKL-158) Appellant AND HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA Respondent AND FIRST GAS LIMITED Section 274 Party Court: Environment Judge MJL Dickey Māori Land...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant AND TE RŪNANGA O MOERAKI, KĀTI HUIRAPA RŪNAKA K...
...order is the need to protect the interests of the child victim. That child’s position is analogous to that of the innocent third parties protected by non-publication orders in R v Liddell [1995] 1 NZLR 539 (CA) at 546. While the principle of open justice dictates that there should be no restriction on publication of information about a case except in very special circumstances, the potential for the child to be re-victimised some 14 years after the offences were committed (the child w...
OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL – PLAN CHANGE 7 – INTERIM DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 164 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under s 142(2)(b) of the Act) BETWEEN OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL (ENV-2020-CHC-127)...