8438 items matching your search terms
...Māori, all too often marginalising them in the area that has for centuries been their home . In our final chapter we make two general recommendations . First, claims of Tauranga iwi and hapū must be addressed as a matter of high priority . Secondly, we recommend greater collaboration and information flow between various arms of government in order to redress the...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 166 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of Plan Change SA to the Regional Plan Water for Otago of an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act LINDIS CATCHMENT GROUP INCORPORATED (ENV-2016-CHC-61) Appellant OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Court : Environment Judge J R Jackson Environment Commissioner KA Edmonds Environme...
...ngā kerēme hou rawa, kaua ko te whakatakoto i ngā panoni ki ngā kerēme onāianei. Tuhinga Ārahi i ngā Tikanga me ngā Tukanga 6 2.12 I te nuinga o te wā, me tuku ngā kerēme ki te Rēhita o te Taraipiunara mā te īmēra ki WT.Registrar@justice.govt.nz.18 Ko te tūmanako a te Taraipiunara kia whiwhi ki ngā kerēme mā te īmēra. Heoi anō, ka taea e ngā kaikerēme te tuku i te kerēme mā te pōhi ki te wāhi noho e whai ake nei : Te Rōpū Whakamana i Te Tiriti o Waitan...
...[2021] NZACC 100 [16 July 2021] IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 100 ACR 305/17 and 225/18 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 151 OF THE ACT BETWEEN IRENE TUTAKANGAHAU Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 14 June 2021 Appearances: J Miller for th...
...4.2.2 If there is liability what is the extent of it? Were the First Respondents Neglectful? [22] The answer is no, they were not. The Tribunal accepts Mr Spargo’s evidence that Norfolk Homes and Mr Mack agreed to take responsibility and all matters pertaining to the construction of the units were dealt with by them. The Spargos’ involvement was limited to only accepting the designs for the units, authorising the making of necessary applications and making payments on the...
...and that the failure to cross-examine a witness does not discount evidence already filed as part of a party‟s case. As Mr Morrison‟s Brief of Evidence was filed in the Tribunal and accepted as part of Mr Chen‟s case, in the interests of justice the Tribunal does not disregard Mr Morrison‟s statements made therein made on the back of Mr Chen‟s failure to cross-examine Mr Westmoreland. [58] Mr Rainey questioned Mr Morrison at the hearing regarding his alternative est...
CLAIM NO: 626 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN LYNETTE BLACK AND JOHN HARRINGTON as trustees for LYN BLACK FAMILY TRUST Claimant AND KW & KR GUTSELL BUILDING LTD First Respondent AND ROCKCOTE ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS NZ LTD Second Respondent AND SOUTHLAND DISTRICT COUNCIL Third Respondent AND NEVILLE EXCELL Fourth Respondent AND CALDER STEWART...
...administrative support for the Board is provided by the Department of Corrections. The Operations Manager noted there was a discrepancy in the decision relating to the month in which a further progress hearing was to be held and the decision was returned to Justice Fraser (the then Panel Convenor) for correction and re-signing. The corrected decision was received back by the Operations Manager later that same day for editing. [16] The edits then made to the decision by the Operations M...
...NAME AND ANY DETAILS THAT MIGHT IDENTIFY THE APPELLANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 189 ACR 234/12 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN CD Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearings: 11 October 2018, 16 July 2020 Heard at: Nelson/ Whakatū and AVL Wellington Amended B...
CLAIM NO: TRI-2007-101-00003 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN Craig Easton and Tania Easton Claimant AND Brian Mayers First Respondent AND Nelson City Council Second Respondent AND Murray Pine Third Respondent AND Cathryn Grace Leov Fourth Respondent (now removed) AND Susan Margaret Leov Fifth Respondent (now removed) Dates of Hearing: 17, 18, 19 Decembe...