Tabram v Slater [pdf, 99 KB]
...c. A cavity system was not required at the time of construction. A cavity on its own would not have prevented water ingress. d. There was inadequate fall to the deck but this did not cause any actual existing damage (there is an issue on this matter in relation to likely future damage). 2 Schedule of leaks – experts’ conference, 13 February 2009. 3 Ibid. Damage to the dwelling [9] Although the experts agree...