McDonald v Accident Compensation Corporation [2015] NZACA 14 [pdf, 207 KB]
...revision of 1981, but subsequently the pain was not constant. [12] Mr McDonald gave evidence in August 2008 to a reviewer of one of the decisions of the Corporation (as recorded in her decision of 3 September 2008). She found him credible. He said that following the amputation, he was in extreme pain and could not use the artificial leg. Mr Allen, the amputating surgeon, told him the problem must be the artificial leg and an Auckland surgeon told him it was “in his head”....