Search Results

Search results for legislation.

18392 items matching your search terms

  1. Uatahausi v Hakaoro [2015] NZIACDT 32 (17 March 2015) [pdf, 131 KB]

    ...Complainant AND Hakaoro Hakaoro Adviser DECISION REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Ms K England, Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment, Auckland. Complainant: Mr N Tupou, Barrister, Tupou Law, Auckland Adviser: In person Date Issued: 17 March 2015 2 DECISION Introduction [1] The Registrar of the Immigration Advisers Authority referred this complaint to the Tribunal. [2] The complaint arose when...

  2. McGregor v Hutchison - Mangamaire B13A Trust (2015) 40 Tākitimu MB 19 (40 TKT 19) [pdf, 176 KB]

    ...188,785 shares. The land is administered by an ahu whenua trust and the original trustee was Erikana Eriha. 1 At the time of hearing the trustees are Catherine Clarkson, Ketepunga Clarkson, Sharlene King, Matana Eriha and James Hutchison. 2 The Law [6] Section 240 of the Act states: 240 Removal of trustee The Court may at any time, in respect of any trustee of a trust to which this [Part] applies, make an order for the removal of the trustee, if it is satisfied- (a) That...

  3. Lefeuvre v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing) [2023] NZACC 173 [pdf, 153 KB]

    ...notice of appeal. [4] On 25 October 2023, Ms Thorburn for the Corporation submitted that, given the minimal delay and absence of prejudice to the Corporation, it does not oppose an extension of time for filing the appeal in this case. Relevant law [5] Section 151 of the Accident Compensation Act 2001 (the Act) provides: (1) An appellant brings an appeal by sending a notice of appeal to, or filing a notice of appeal in, a specified registry. ... (3) The notice must be rece...

  4. Hoete v Faulkner Motiti North C No 1 Block (2017) 140 Waikato Maniapoto MB 1 (140 WMN 1) [pdf, 173 KB]

    ...granted her right of appeal will be rendered nugatory; b) That the appeal is filed on bona fide grounds; c) That neither the Hoetes or any third parties will be prejudicially affected by a stay; d) That the appeal raises important questions of law and that the overall balance of convenience favours her. 4 Dymocks Franchise Systems (NSW) Pty Ltd v Bilgola Enterprises Ltd (1999) 13 PRNZ 48 (HC), approved by the Court of Appeal in Bi...

  5. Deputy Registrar - Succession to Ngarangi Kapapa Wiari Selwyn Turoa [2017] Chief Judge's MB 172 (2017 CJ 172) [pdf, 442 KB]

    ...grandchildren, Mary Tekiriwera Bishop, was actually 21 at the date of the Court order. Again, it is not apparent why she was excluded; perhaps because the facts presented to the Court were incomplete. [15] In any case, there is no doubt that, as a matter of law and fact, the following individuals who were alive when the deceased died, should also have been listed as successors: (a) Mary Tekiriwera Bishop, DOB 25 January 1986; (b) Hetekia Ru Turoa, DOB 6 March 1987; (c) Rangi A...

  6. QA v IZ & Anor LCRO 219/2014 (31 March 2015) [pdf, 37 KB]

    LCRO 219/2014 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Standards Committee BETWEEN QA Applicant AND IZ, CP and NF Respondents The names and indentifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Mr QA seeks a review of a Standards Committee determination dated 5 September 2014. Background

  7. Notes from Crown Maori Relations hui Auckland 6 May 2018 [pdf, 432 KB]

    ...few speakers talked about the need for a discussion about what a “republic” would mean for the Crown/Māori relationship. • Māori midwifery - one person raised the importance of Māori midwifery practices being given due recognition in law. • Name of the Portfolio and government agency support – A few speakers raised the name of the portfolio suggesting a name change that reflected the Treaty as underpinning the relationship (e.g., Minister of Treaty of Waitangi Crown...

  8. Bupa Aged Care v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing to the District Court) [2024] NZACC 92 (29 May 2024) [pdf, 145 KB]

    ...miscommunications and inadequate management of the appeal process. [4] On 23 May 2024, Ms Becroft for the Corporation submitted that there was no prejudice to it caused by the delay, and the late filing of the appeal was not opposed. Relevant law [5] Section 151 of the Accident Compensation Act 2001 (the Act) provides: (1) An appellant brings an appeal by sending a notice of appeal to, or filing a notice of appeal in, a specified registry. ... (3) The notice must be receive...

  9. QE v HN [2024] NZDT 212 (7 March 2024) [pdf, 92 KB]

    ...towards replacing the fence, or any part of it, and he denied any liability for the sum that QE claimed. The issue [9] The question for me to decide is whether HN is liable to contribute to the costs that QE incurred in building the fence. The law [10] When parties do not agree about the necessity for a new boundary fence, or the nature of it or its cost, the procedure set out under the Fencing Act 1978 generally should be followed. However, if the parties make their own agre...

  10. SN v K Ltd [2022] NZDT 117 (15 August 2022) [pdf, 108 KB]

    ...finished so she could move in. While I appreciate that the house build had a number of pressures, especially given the delays caused by Covid pandemic lockdowns, I am unable to disregard the provisions of the Fencing Act 1978. I am bound to apply the law as it is written. The Fencing Act 1978 is very clear that an occupier cannot be compelled to contribute to a boundary fence if they have not been served with a Fencing Act 1978 notice. Therefore, the claim for costs related to the boundary...