Search Results

1. Shelford v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late appeal to the District Court) [2023] NZACC 31 [pdf, 156 KB]

   ...Notice of Appeal on 20 December 2022 and asked a Community Charitable Trust to email this to the Court, and so thought that he thought that his appeal was filed then. On 3 February 2023, he instructed Ms Findlater to act on his behalf. Relevant law [4] Section 151 of the Accident Compensation Act 2001 (the Act) provides: (1) An appellant brings an appeal by sending a notice of appeal to, or filing a notice of appeal in, a specified registry. ... (3) The notice must be recei...

2. MLC - 2012 February - The appointment of trustees to Māori land trusts [pdf, 319 KB]

   ...s 222 is to require nominees to submit resumes with their application and for the Court to then pose questions to candidates for appointment that might include their knowledge of accounts and financial reporting, the trust order and general trust law principles, farming, forestry, tourism, geothermal power, property investment, equities and communications. Knowledge of the history and tikanga associated with the land will also be a relevant consideration. Much will depend on the nature...

3. X School v H Ltd [2023] NZDT 338 (13 July 2023) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...resolved are: i. Was H the project manager? ii. Was H required to notify X when costs exceeded available funds? iii. Did H’s failure to notify X when costs exceeded available funds cause a loss? CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 9. The law of contract is central to this dispute. The contract signed between the parties was titled, “short form agreement for consultant engagement.” The parties are familiar with contracts. Was H the project manager? 10. It was clear t...

4. Ferris - Nuhiti M10 (2004) 157 Gisborne MB 253 (157 GIS 253) [pdf, 291 KB]

   ...requirements under Part VI 1.1 had been addressed and satisfied. Furthermore, since section 295/93 could only be applied at the time the partition application was before the Maori Land Court, it could not be relevant to these proceedings. Relevant Law There is no dispute that all the requirements under Part VIII of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 have been complied with. No counter offer to purchase this block has been received from the preferred classes. The only issue that remains to b...

5. Wiping historical homosexual offences application form [docx, 146 KB]

   ...[bookmark: _Hlk495078202]Indicate your preferred contact address [bookmark: Check3]|_| my email address [bookmark: Check4]|_| my postal address (in a plain envelope marked ‘private and confidential’) [bookmark: Check5]|_| my lawyer or other representative’s address. Please write their address below: [bookmark: Text44]      1. Are you applying for yourself or on behalf of someone who has died? |_| myself |_| spouse/civil union partner/de f

6. DP v VK Ltd [2014] NZDT 753 (28 November 2014) [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...completed on 11 and 12 November 2013? [10] If so, is VK Limited liable to pay the amount claimed by DP of $ 14,031.17? What were the terms of the agreement between CC and DP in relation to the rock picking work done at AA? [11] The law of contract and agency applies to this dispute. [12] CC gave evidence in person and stated that he agreed with DP that DP would transport his rock picking machine to AA Station and the rate would be $265 per hour plus the cost of br...

7. Matheis v Ling [2016] NZIACDT 30 (13 June 2016) [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar BETWEEN Alexandre Matheis Complainant AND Hong Ling Adviser DECISION IMPOSING SANCTIONS REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Mr A Dumbleton, lawyer, MBIE, Auckland. Complainant: In person. Adviser: Mr G C Jenkin, barrister, instructed by Mr N Faigan, Solicitor, Auckland. Date Issued: 13 June 2016 2 DECISION This complaint [1] This decision impose

8. MX v X Ltd [2023] NZDT 251 (28 April 2023) [pdf, 241 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 251 APPLICANT MX RESPONDENT X Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. MX contracted X Ltd to provide dental treatment to straighten her teeth. Dr T recommended a treatment using [orthodontic product]. Treatment continued for three years, after which time, Dr T advised the treatment

9. FU Ltd v TB Ltd [2020] NZDT 1394 (4 March 2020) [pdf, 104 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1394 APPLICANT FU Ltd RESPONDENT TB Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: TB Ltd is to pay the sum of $1559.24 directly to FU Ltd on or before 25 March 2020. Reasons 1. TB Ltd ('TB') performed a WOF inspection for FU Ltd, for a vehicle FU Ltd ('FU') had sold to a customer. The WOF inspection was perf

10. Apostolakis No. 2 (Rejection of Statement of Claim) [2017] NZHRRT 33 [pdf, 222 KB]

    ...“Rodney Knight – Risk and Compliance of Public Trust Corporate Office, PublicTrust.co.nz” [2.2] “Herman De Groot and Sarah Wilson (Hunter De Groot, counsel)” [2.3] “The Attorney-General in respect of Mr Charles M Gallagher solicitor, Crown Law Office”. 1 [This decision is to be cited as: Re Apostolakis No. 2 (Rejection of Statement of Claim) [2017] NZHRRT 33.] 2 [3] The following documents were attached t...