18392 items matching your search terms
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2015] NZLCDT 40 LCDT 008/15 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 4 Applicant AND CAROLE SMITH Practitioner CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Ms F Freeman Ms C Rowe Ms S Sage Mr I Williams HELD at District Court, Auckland DATE OF HEARING 12 November 2015 DATE OF DECISION 19 November 2015
...address this issue. The payment of $7 weekly for travel related disability costs remained unchanged. [12] After an internal review Mr XXXX sought review by a Benefits Review Committee which upheld the decision on 27 July 2016. The relevant law [13] Section 69C(2A)(a) of the Social Security Act 1964 provides that a disability allowance may be paid to a person where that person has additional expenses of an ongoing kind arising from their disability. Clause 4 of the M...
LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2020] NZLCRO 172 Ref: LCRO 045/2020 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN MN Applicant AND RK Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed Introduction [1] Mr MN has a
...November 2023, Mr Castle, for the Corporation, submitted that the delay is insignificant, the reasons provided by Mr Robinson are credible, there is no real prejudice to the Corporation caused by the late filing, and this is not opposed. Relevant law [5] Section 151 of the Accident Compensation Act 2001 (the Act) provides: (1) An appellant brings an appeal by sending a notice of appeal to, or filing a notice of appeal in, a specified registry. ... (3) The notice must be received...
...not occurred? c) Did H Ltd do anything to contribute to the damage? Did the trustees of the Trust breach their duty of care by failing to clean the roof at Unit C and did this cause flooding damage to Unit D? 4. The general principles of the law of negligence apply to this dispute. I am satisfied that the Trust owed a duty of care to H Ltd’s to manage Unit C in a way that didn’t cause damage to Unit D. I have carefully considered the evidence and submissions of both parties. I...
...Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar BETWEEN Parminder Gill Complainant AND Daljit Singh Adviser DECISION REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Ms Carr, lawyer, MBIE, Auckland Complainant: No appearance at hearing Adviser: Mr S Laurent, lawyer, Laurent Law, Auckland Date Issued: 6 April 2017 2 DECISION Introduction [1] This is the second decision relating to t...
...by a Benefits Review Committee to decline an application for New Zealand Superannuation made by the appellant on 30 October 2014. [2] The application was declined on the basis that the appellant did not meet the residence criteria of 10 years’ lawful residence in New Zealand so as to be granted New Zealand Superannuation. Background [3] The appellant is a 78 year old widow from China. [4] A decision of the Immigration and Protection Tribunal (IPT)1
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1464 APPLICANT NK RESPONDENT EI Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. NK took his car to EI Ltd to have the rust around the windscreen of his vehicle repaired, which needed to happen before the windscreen itself could be replaced. Some months after the job was completed, NK again needed to h
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 219 APPLICANT LL RESPONDENT XX The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim and counterclaim are dismissed. Reasons: 1. LL is claiming $8,033.25 for payment of work that he did on XX’s [ute] in February this year. 2. XX disputes that the payment is outstanding. He claims that he has paid LL $7,000.00 in cash,
...the stated 28-day timeframe referred to 28 working days. Ms Smart’s representative provided an affidavit to this effect. [3] On 6 December 2022, Ms Hansen for the Corporation submitted that it did not oppose the grant of leave. Relevant law [4] Section 151 of the Accident Compensation Act 2001 (the Act) provides: (1) An appellant brings an appeal by sending a notice of appeal to, or filing a notice of appeal in, a specified registry. ... (3) The notice must be received...