[2006] NZEmpC AC 44/06 Spotless Services (NZ) Ltd v Service and Food Workers Union Inc [pdf, 71 KB]
...occurred, as I said earlier, the employer would simply make up the difference to comply fully with clause 7.2. [21] Mr Cranney made some point of the words “already receiving” used in the plaintiffs submissions as indicating a flaw in Mr Harrison’s arguments. However, I think the words used simply reflect a convenience in language. I surmise that what is really meant is “already entitled to receive” or words to that effect. [22] Nevertheless, I am of the vie...