Search Results

1. [2018] NZEnvC 025 Minister of Corrections v Otorohanga District Council [pdf, 16 MB]

   ...[2015] NZHC 1991 at [110]: While the provisions in Part 2 are not operative provisions (in the sense of being sections under which particular planning decisions are made), they nevertheless comprise a guide for the performance of the specific legislative functions. As King Salmon said with reference to s 5: (a) [it] states a guiding principle which is intended to be applied by those performing functions under the RMA rather than a specifically worded purpose intended more as an...

2. Hutt Valley Justice Sector innovation project phase 2 final report: Delivering better public services at the frontline [pdf, 1.9 MB]

   ...our agencies leverage relationships and develop shared goals 1 Stats NZ population estimate June 2013 2 For this report, CYF (youth justice) is considered a justice sector agency (with a legislated justice role), recognising that it is also a key social service agency. T 6 with other sectors and agencies to maximise our impact. Operational managers have actively maintained and developed these relationships through...

3. E11 Craig Fitzgerald - Noise and Vibration - EIC - Applicant [pdf, 12 MB]

   ...services, piling activities and base construction. It also addresses potential airborne noise from AC36 events, such as festivals, concerts and live race broadcasts and the operation of syndicate bases. These matters are assessed against the relevant legislation, planning rules and existing environment. I authored the Construction Noise and Vibration Assessment1, draft Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan (CNVMP)2 and Events Noise Assessment3 attached to the Resourc...

4. LCRO 80/2021 A LN and B LN v QG (9 November 2021) [pdf, 265 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2021] NZLCRO 176 Ref: LCRO 80/2021 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN A LN and B LN Applicants AND QG Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr a

5. [2010] NZEmpC 84 Secretary for Justice v Dodd [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...former domestic partner by contacting the complainant about her victim impact statement. In connection with the same prosecution, Ms Dodd had accessed information about it on the Ministry’s computer database at the request of her nephew’s lawyer and supplied this to the lawyer. 1 WA201/09, 17 December 2009. [3] Ms Dodd now concedes that she was, thereby, guilty of serious misconduct and misconduct respectively in her e...

6. LCRO 240/2016 HM v NL (28 November 2018) [pdf, 255 KB]

   LCRO 240/2016 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN HM Applicant AND NL Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr HM has applied to review a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X], in which the Comm

7. Tatere - Mangatainoka No 1BC No 2C Tamaki 2A2A Balance [2013] Māori Appellate Court MB 243 (2013 APPEAL 243) [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...APPELLATE COURT Copies to: Mr Leo Watson, Barrister & Solicitor, PO Box 92 Paekakariki Kapiti Coast, leowatson@paradise.net.nz. Ms Emma Dawson, Bramwell Grossman, PO Box 500 Hastings 4156, eeld@bramwells.co.nz. Mr John Appleby, Ladbrook Law, PO Box 37633, Parnell, Auckland 1151. Mr Nathan Milner, Kahui Legal, PO Box 1654, Wellington 6140. Mr Stuart Webster, Sainsbury Logan & Williams, PO Box 41 Napier 4140 Ms Nicola Roberts, Dorrington Poole, PO Box 69, Dannevirke 4...

8. LCRO 173/2014 G NP and H NP v DC (27 September 2018) [pdf, 289 KB]

   LCRO 173/2014 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN G NP and H NP Applicant AND DC Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] G NP and H NP (the NPs) have applied to review a decision by the [Area] Standards Committe

9. [2015] NZEmpC 36 Yan v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [pdf, 280 KB]

   ...Yan. [40] Mr Yan notified a personal grievance on 23 February 2012. The notification of grievance referred to Mr Ridling’s decision to dismiss and set out Mr Yan’s view that the decision to dismiss was both procedurally and substantively flawed. Bias [41] As will be evident from the overview outlined above, the PIP process provided a comprehensive framework for managing performance concerns fairly. The primary focus of the policy is on improvement and employee...

10. Gardiner v Gorringe (2011) 25 Waikato Maniapoto MB 83 (25 WMN 83) [pdf, 293 KB]

    ...Counsel for the Defendants Mr C M Bidois, Counsel for the First and Second Third Parties Judgment: 22 July 2011 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE S R CLARK Copy to Counsel: Mr J P Koning, Koning Webster, P O Box 13309, Tauranga 3141, john@kwlaw.co.nz Mr A A Hopkinson, Cooney Lees Morgan, DX HP40001, Tauranga, ahopkinson@clmlaw.co.nz Mr C M Bidois, East Brewster, DX JP30017, Rotorua, bidois@eastbrewster.co.nz 25 Waikato Maniapoto 84 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introducti...