Search Results

1. U v Tangilanu [2015] NZIACDT 61 1(19 May 2015) [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...failing to inform her clients about Immigration New Zealand’s queries, and then not taking instructions and replying to Immigration New Zealand. [3.2.3] Failed to report to her clients, they were in a situation where they were in New Zealand unlawfully, and failing to respond appropriately would potentially harm their long-term immigration prospects. [4] The full circumstances are set out in the substantive decision. The Parties’ Positions on Sanctions [5] The Registrar provid...

2. Mayfair Street Units v Spargo [pdf, 54 KB]

   ...out of adjudication proceedings if it is fair and appropriate in all the circumstances. It is generally accepted that an application for removal or strike out should only be made as a preliminary issue where a claim is untenable in fact and law. An adjudicator should not attempt to resolve genuinely disputed issues of fact unless he or she has all the necessary material before him or her. Even then the jurisdiction to strike out should be exercised judiciously and sparingly bec...

3. HM v BTO Ltd [2020] NZDT 1385 (4 May 2020) [pdf, 248 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1385 APPLICANT HM RESPONDENT BTO Limited RESPONDENT UU Limited SECOND RESPONDENT KN The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. UU Limited is to pay HM $4,148.00 by Wednesday 3 June 2020. 2. On receipt of the sum referred to above, UU Limited is to collect the wood fired hot tub at a time mutually agreed between

4. [2023] NZEmpC 157 Whakarongorau Aotearoa New Zealand Telehealth Services LP v Public Service Association, Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...By the time this matter was heard at 12.30 pm on 15 September 2023, a contingency plan for life preserving services had been agreed in relation to both areas of work by Emergency Teletriage nurses and paramedics and EMHR nurses/clinicians. The law [11] The Court has jurisdiction to determine proceedings issued for the grant of an injunction to stop a strike under s 100 of the Act. The applicable principles are uncontroversial. [12] First, the Court must be satisfied whether there...

5. LN & TN v TT Ltd [2024] NZDT 152 (1 March 2024) [pdf, 206 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 152 APPLICANT LN APPLICANT TN RESPONDENT TT Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. LN and TN contracted with TT Ltd in April 2020 to have a shower installed for $3,910.00 and said that the shower came with a 5-year warranty. After 3 years, they noticed that the shower tray had developed hairline cracks and

6. BL & KL v QT [2024] NZDT 206 (12 April 2024) [pdf, 114 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 206 APPLICANT BL APPLICANT KL RESPONDENT QT APPLICANT'S INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. BL and KL contracted QT to paint the aluminium joinery on their newly-purchased home for a discounted “cash” price. BL and KL wanted a more modern colour and had consu

7. Data highlights for children and young people June 2019 [pdf, 525 KB]

   ...and young people (aged 14 - 16) who have charges finalised in any court from the year ending June 1993 (1992/1993) to the year ending June 2019 (2018/2019).2 Youth justice system Most children and young people who get into trouble with the law don't go to court but are instead dealt with by Police in the community. This could mean getting a Police warning or being referred to Police Youth Aid. A family group conference happens in more serious circumstances where the Pol...

8. Tuhi v Tuhi - Toa Toa Tuhi Estate (2020) 83 Takitimu MB 51 (83 TKT 51) [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...he has potentially unlimited personal liability as executor and trustee of the estate and, that as the decision referred to above confirms, recipient liability may also be relevant where any person has received funds belonging to another without lawful authority and has subsequently failed to account for those funds. Accordingly, Mr Tuhi is urged to seek legal advice. The short point is that Mr Tuhi has been provided with ample opportunity to account for his executorship of the esta...

9. Walters v Miller - Oruanui 10 (Māori Reservation) (2017) 167 Waiariki MB 176 (167 WAR 176) [pdf, 252 KB]

   ...reservation trustees. The email purports to show that Mr Walters asked, on behalf of the Land trustees, himself and families Ms Wikiriwhi and Ms des Barres be suspended from anything to do with the marae and the Oruanui lands effective immediately. The Law [20] Section 43 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 states: 43 Rehearings (1) Subject to subsection (2), on an application made in accordance with the rules of court by any person interested in any matter in respect of which th...

10. Logan - Omahu 2H1B and Others (2024) 109 Tākitimu MB 199-206 (109 TKT 199-206) [pdf, 234 KB]

    ...they have breached the trust order for the Trust. The Trustees accept that they may not have complied with all of the provisions of the trust order, but do not accept that there are any financial anomalies within the Trust. Ngā ture The law [6] This Court has extensive supervisory powers over trusts.4 That said, the Court is not usually concerned with day-to-day operational issues. Instead, the Court is usually concerned with higher level matters of policy. A review should...