18335 items matching your search terms
LCRO 88/2013 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [North Island] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN NE Applicant AND RL Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed DECISION Introduction [1] Mr NE has applied for a review of a decision by the [North Island] Standards Committee [X] dated 20 F
...which would reasonably have been available to the parties in the situation in which they were at the time of contract. The language the parties use is generally given its natural and ordinary meaning, reflecting the proposition that the common law does not easily accept that linguistic mistakes have been made in formal 2 Silver Fern Farms Ltd v New Zealand Meat Workers and Related Trade Unions Inc [2010] NZCA 317, [2010] ERNZ 317....
...the appeal is allowed. ACR 262/21 [78] Should there be any issue as to costs, counsel have leave to file memoranda in respective of within one month. Judge C J McGuire District Court Judge Solicitors: ACC and Employment Law, Ellerslie Medico Law Limited, Grey Lynn
...Agreement) • be honest, open and transparent with the AODT Court team. This approach is needed for your recovery journey • attend treatment, recovery groups, and any other services or supports the Court offers you • tell your case manager, lawyer or peer support if you use alcohol or other drugs or decide to leave the treatment programme • go to drug testing when asked to • wear an alcohol monitoring bracelet (SCRAM bracelet) if the judge says you need to • come...
...reached a partial settlement with the claimants for $652,002 with a denial of liability. The apportionment of responsibility between the parties remains confidential. 7. The decision in Petrou v Weathertight Homes Resolution Service sets out the law applicable in relation to claims that have been assigned, or more properly referred to as subrogated. Randerson J held at [27] and [28] that rights of subrogation, vested by operation of 5 law, enables another party to continue...
...been made (now to the Court where these proceedings are) for such leave if a grievance or grievances were not raised by Mr Davis in time. An employer’s consent or waiver may, in some circumstances, be implied by acquiescence. [3] The relevant law just summarised is contained in s 114 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act). That provides materially: 114 Raising personal grievance (1) Every employee who wishes to raise a personal grievance must, subject to subsection...
...and ongoing mechanical neck pain. [41] On 6 December 2021, Mr Jonathan Manson, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon, having seen Mr Hookway, diagnosed “right upper limb radiculopathy. C5/6 and C6/7 levels most stenotic on MRI scan”. Relevant law [42] Section 20(2)(a) of the Act provides that a person has cover for a personal injury which is caused by an accident. Section 26(2) states that “personal injury” does not include personal injury caused wholly or substantially by a...
...which was operated out of 29 Waikare Road. The appellants state that Kimberly told them that she had approached real estate agencies in relation to her interest. [8] The appellants temporarily separated in October 2009. [9] On 18 January 2010, Lawton Valuers, provided the appellants with a valuation of $1,100,000 for 31 Waikare Road. On 19 January 2010 a valuation was provided for 29 Waikare Road at $1,450,000. [10] In March 2010, the appellants asked Bayleys Waiheke, Waiheke Real E...
...be seen that the sprain incident was likely responsible for work limitation for two to three months. Beyond that time symptom expression and pain limitation relates to degenerative rotator cuff disease unrelated to accident injury. Relevant law [27] Section 20(2)(a) of the Act provides that a person has cover for a personal injury which is caused by an accident. Section 26(2) states that “personal injury” does not include personal injury caused wholly or substantially by a...
...pay his mortgage or to pay for insurance. He relied on credit cards and loans from family members. [26] On 3 July 2013, Mr Mitchell applied for a review of ACC’s decision to suspend his weekly compensation. He was represented by John Miller Law, a specialist ACC firm. [27] On 2 April 2014, a psychiatrist, Mark Davies, provided a report about Mr Mitchell to John Miller Law. In 2006, Mr Davies had prepared a report on Mr Mitchell diagnosing him with anxiety and clinical depression w...