18380 items matching your search terms
...not employed between 1989 and 1997. [56] Accordingly, I must dismiss this appeal. [57] There is to issue as to costs. Judge C J McGuire District Court Judge Solicitors: Young Hunter, Christchurch ACC and Employment Law, Ellerslie, Auckland 3 See Tonner n2 above at [45].
...question of whether the respondent’s children are the grandchildren of the deceased. Counsel states that the question has already been determined by the High Court on 16 October 2012. [24] Counsel argues that per s 108(2)(a) the deceased was lawfully entitled to leave his Māori land interests to his children and remoter issue. Counsel says that the High Court judgment identifies the deceased’s grandchildren and submits that it is only those grandchildren who can be the remote...
...ensure training and supervision takes place and what happens? 7. What are your expectation[s] of how the Licensees you supervise should ensure that clients who are not fluent in English are made aware of all information that they are required by law or fairness to have in relation to a sale and purchase? 8. What (if any) practices do you have in place to ensure that appropriate client and customer care is exercised for parties who are not fluent in English? Please also provide...
...breached clause 1.5 of the Code. [18.7.3] She failed to carry out Mr Hakaumotu’s instructions to apply for a residence visa. This was a breach of clause 1.1 of the Code, as she failed to act with care and professionalism, and did not carry out the lawful informed instructions of her client. [18.7.4] She failed to report to Mr Hakaumotu. This was a breach of clause 3 of the Code. [18.7.5] She failed to use Mr Hakaumotu’s funds only for the purpose for which they were given, and...
LCRO 161/2010 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Auckland Standards Committee 4 BETWEEN BG of Auckland Applicant AND YQ of Auckland Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION [1] An application for review was made by Ms BG (the Applicant) for the review of a Standard
...[7] On 14 April 2023, the Council filed an application for indemnity costs against Mr Armishaw, seeking a total sum of $20,477.65 (excluding GST). The Council contends that indemnity costs are appropriate for the following reasons: (a) the unlawful discharge of human sewage beyond Mr Armishaw’s property was a clear breach of the Resource Management Act 1991 (‘RMA’ or ‘the Act’) and the Regional Water Plan; (b) the Council was obliged to commence these proceedings against...
...Relations Authority where it was successful. 1 The Authority accepted CANZ’s submission that a variation to the collective agreement was required. [6] The Chief Executive has challenged that determination and says that the Authority erred in law. Issues [7] The issue raised by this challenge is whether a variation to the collective agreement is required before the changes the Chief Executive sought to implement in July 2015 can be carried out. The way the parties presented...
...Case Manager’s Report and Recommendation. Discussion [6] Pursuant to s 44 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 the Chief Judge may cancel or amend an order made by the Court or a Registrar, if satisfied that the order was erroneous in fact or in law because of any mistake or omission on the part of the Court or the 2017 Chief Judge’s MB 43 Registrar or in the presentation of the facts of the case to the Court or the Registrar. The Chief Judge may also make such other orde...
...out. 29. This damage is consistent with KB’s theory. The damage is unlikely to have occurred after B came adrift and went aground on the rocks. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 4 of 7 30. The theory put forward by KB (supported by SX) is flawed. B does not have, and has never had, a bow roller pin. 31. The question of whether B grounded during the storm, and whether this was a contributing factor to the headline snapping (in the way that KB describes) is more complex.
...C Sandelin - Member HEARD at X City on 3 June 2014 DATE OF SUBSTANTIVE DECISION HEREIN 1 August 2014 [2014] NZREADT 58 DATE OF THIS DECISION ON PENALTY 18 September 2014 REPRESENTATION Mr B D Vanderkolk, counsel for appellant Ms K Lawson-Bradshaw, counsel for the Authority The second respondent complainant on her own behalf INTERIM DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL ON PENALTY Introduction [1] Mr and Mrs X (“the licensees”) appealed to us against an 11 May 2012 decision...