Search Results

1. [2024] NZEmpC 212 Kavallaris v Inframax Construction Ltd [pdf, 295 KB]

   ...managing construction projects, championing health and safety, overseeing and maintaining all staffing matters, and pursuing new business opportunities. [7] Issues arose between Mr Kavallaris and Ms Gribben. On 7 December 2023 Mr Kavallaris’ lawyer wrote to Inframax raising concerns of workplace stress, unfair disadvantage, and being subjected to unfair and unreasonable behaviour. The complaint primarily related to Ms Gribben. Mr Kavallaris requested that his concerns

2. Rapana v Anderson - Te Kōmiti Matua o te Haahi Rātana (2024) 492 Aotea MB 95 (492 AOT 95) [pdf, 335 KB]

   ...Whakapūmau 2020 ....................................................................................... [13] Ngā ture .................................................................................................................. [22] The law Ngā take .................................................................................................................. [25] The issues Kōrerorero ..................................................................................

3. [2007] NZEmpC CC 28/07 B & D Doors Ltd v Hamilton [pdf, 77 KB]

   ...did not even touch the controls of the machine.” [42] At the beginning of the meeting Mr Wall also presented a three-page document headed “PREPARATION NOTE”. This contained a summary of Mr Wall’s views on certain aspects of employment law together with extracts from the Employment Relations Act 2000 and the Industrial Relations Act 1973. It went on to suggest that Mr Foster had predetermined the matter, that he and others had a “vested interest” in the outcome and that...

4. [2011] NZEmpC 34 Martin v Northland Education Trust Inc [pdf, 219 KB]

   ...against her and of the consequence of summary dismissal and did not decide these issues in a fair and open minded way after a fair consideration of all reasonable circumstances. [24] Either together or in combination, the plaintiff says that these flaws meant that the defendant did not meet the s 103A test of which it is required to satisfy the Court, namely that what it did and how it did it were what a fair and reasonable employer would have done at the time in all the circumstanc...

5. Delamere v Jiang [2017] NZIACDT 1 (17 February 2017) [pdf, 295 KB]

   ...the Immigration Act 2009, or leave New Zealand. [12.5] On 28 November 2011, Mr Jiang lodged a request for a visa under section 61, which Immigration New Zealand refused on 15 December 2011. Immigration New Zealand gave no reasons, which is a lawful response to a section 61 request in the circumstance Ms Wang made her request. [12.6] Mr Jiang lodged an appeal under humanitarian grounds to the Immigration and Protection Tribunal, against deportation on 22 December 2011. That Tri...

6. [2019] NZEnvC 176 Upper Clutha Environmental Society Inc v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 27 MB]

   ...the parties [1] 1.2 The issues, the plan changes and the outstanding natural landscape at [12] Arthurs Point 1.3 The UCESI submission on the PC1 (N) 1.4 The Commissioners' Decision(s) and the appeal by UCESl 1.5 The context of PC1 The law 2.1 The powers of local authorities (and the court) under Schedule 1 2.2 The recognition of outstanding natural landscapes The scope of the UCESI appeal 3.1 The issue and the arguments 3.2 Consideration Can the court grant conseque...

7. [2022] NZACC 32– CJ v ACC (9 March 2022) [pdf, 271 KB]

   ...proximity to an IRA bomb explosion but suffered no serious physical injuries as a result. He returned to New Zealand in 1981. Over the years, he worked as a mechanic and then maintained an IT business. He now also has a part-time job managing a law practice. [3] On 9 December 1981, Dr D Sarfati, Psychiatrist, reported that she had seen the appellant on a number of occasions, and that he was “crippled with a serious personality disorder, characterised not only by his inabilit...

8. [2018] NZEnvC 132 Caradoc-Davies v S R Clearwater [pdf, 11 MB]

   ...[17] I do not intend extensively to set out the arguments that were addressed by the three counsel. Rather, I approach the analysis utilising key elements of what they submitted, that guide me to the answer pursuant to principles established in case law. [18] Mr Garbett helpfully and succinctly offered a framework for establishing the principles, he said derived from a decision of the Court of Appeal Gillies Waiheke Limited & others v Auckland City Council,2 which concerned appeal...

9. Welcome-Guide-Information-for-court-and-tribunal-interpreters-v5.docx [docx, 1.7 MB]

   ...detention. Conflict of Interest – where a person (interpreter) knows or knows of a participant that is going through the courts. Coroner – judicial officer appointed to look into sudden or suspicious deaths to establish what happened Counsel – a lawyer who represents one of the parties in a court case Court Manager – Individual(s) who manages teams of people within the District Court. Also looks after the day to day running of the court. Court order – formal direction from the cour...

10. [2022] NZACC 19 - McBryde v ACC (9 February 2022) [pdf, 453 KB]

    ...in 1994 is reversed. ACR 242-18-McBryde [129] Should there be any issue as to costs, counsel have leave to file memoranda in respect thereof. Judge C J McGuire District Court Judge Solicitors: Schmidt and Peart Law, Auckland for the appellant Medico Law Limited, Auckland for the respondent