Search Results

Search results for legislation.

18392 items matching your search terms

  1. Auckland Standards Committee v Sorensen [2011] NZLCDT 10 [pdf, 189 KB]

    ...do so. 24. When he had these discussions with the executors and trustees Mr Sorensen said he had assumed that he should act as instructed by them, as he considered them his clients. That was his position notwithstanding his knowledge of unlawfulness of the scheme the subject of their instructions. His view was that he was obliged to accept the instructions, even though he was aware that meant that the provisions of the will would not be observed, and legatees would not receiv...

  2. Juror Satisfaction Survey: 2018 results [pdf, 797 KB]

    ...on which to base our verdict” – Dunedin DC “[I would like more information about] how juries might organise themselves in the jury room in order to reach a verdict e.g. decision-making processes and methods” – Nelson DC “Access to law books. i.e. Knowing what the defendant is getting charged of by definition.” – Wanganui DC Information provided post-trial This is a further area that was identified for improvement in 2017. Jurors were asked, if their defendant h...

  3. Brooking v Andrews - Waipapa 9 and Others (2022) 273 Waiarki MB 35 (2022 WAR 35) [pdf, 290 KB]

    ...Between THERESE GWEN BROOKING, ANNE MARIE KENDALL QSM, GAYLE RAUAMOA MCLEAN, ANTHONY RALPH MATARA ROTARANGI, SAM ANDREWS JNR AND WAIPAPA GROUP LIMITED ON BEHALF OF WAIPAPA 9 TRUST Ngā kaitono Applicants ME And MATTHEW LAWRENCE ANDREWS Te kaiurupare Respondents Nohoanga: Hearing On the papers (Heard at [ ]) Whakataunga: Judgment date 8 April 2022 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ C T COXHEAD Judgment of Judge C T Coxhea...

  4. CAC306 v Zhou & Anor [2016] NZREADT 12 [pdf, 212 KB]

    ...Chairperson Ms N Dangen - Member Ms C Sandelin - Member HEARD at AUCKLAND on penalty on 25 November 2015 DATE OF OUR SUBSTANTIVE DECISION HEREIN 10 July 2015 [2015] NZREADT 51 DATE OF THIS PENALTY DECISION 11 February 2016 APPEARANCES Ms K H Lawson-Bradshaw, counsel for the prosecution Mr H Laubscher, counsel for Mr Zhou Mr S She on his own behalf Mr A Deng assisted as interpreter of Mandarin PENALTY DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL [1] As we explained in some detail in our 1...

  5. Short - Tumu Kaituna 14 (2021) 249 Waiariki MB 71 (249 WAR 71) [pdf, 238 KB]

    ...for a status change and to vary the trust in order to further development plans for the whenua. Those applications have been concluded. [2] This application by the trust is for funding from the Special Aid Fund for the costs of an additional lawyer, Mr Liam McEntegart. The trust does not seek special aid funding for the services of their main counsel Mr Graeme Dennett. Ko te hātepe ture o te tono nei - Procedural history [3] The applicants filed the applications for a change...

  6. E71 Keith Ingram - EIC - Tug William C Daldy [pdf, 3.5 MB]

    ...as is agreed by the parties or failing their agreement within 7 days following the first date one party nominates a mediator, then a mediator will be appointed (at either party's request) by the president for the time being of the New Zealand Law Society whose decision as to the appointment of the mediator will be final and binding on the parties. 2210 -~ -{2 Date f The Tug William C Daldy Preservation Society Inc. 2211 Schedule 1: Berth Plan 2212 .."" ......

  7. Waitangi Tribunal - issue 63 of Te Manutukutuku [pdf, 1.5 MB]

    ...to Tūhoe, even though the Crown had not intended to punish them, and the Crown did return land to others. In later years the Crown repeatedly told Tūhoe that confiscation was deserved. The Tribunal found that the confiscation was probably unlawful as the law then stood and was certainly in breach of the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi. It further found that the Crown’s failure to return land wrongly confiscated from Tūhoe was unjust and in breach of the Treaty. In reach...

  8. Waitangi Tribunal - Preparing claimant evidence for the Waitangi Tribunal [pdf, 1.3 MB]

    ...preparing evidence for Waitangi Tribunal claims 1. I: PREPARING EVIDENCE FOR CLAIMS TO THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL Introduction Claims to the Waitangi Tribunal are complaints that: (a) the Crown has breached the Treaty of Waitangi by partic- ular actions, laws, policies, or inactions; and (b) Maori have suffered prejudice (harmful effects) as a result. Claims need to be comprehensive – that is, cover all matters at issue between claimants and the Crown – and they need to be proven ...

  9. CBC v KFTO [2012] NZIACDT 24 (25 May 2012) [pdf, 131 KB]

    ...the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY Immigration Advisers Authority Authority BETWEEN CBC Complainant AND KFTO Adviser DECISION REPRESENTATION: Adviser S Laurent, Laurent Law, Auckland Complainant In person Date Issued: 25 May 2012 2 DECISION Outline [1] This complaint primarily relates to miscommunication between Ms CBC and Ms KFTO. [2] Ms CBC was in South Africa...