Hamblyn v Auckland City Council [pdf, 53 KB]
...the deck he would have sought an assurance from the builder that the bearer met the requirements of NZS3604. Mr Barr argues that this assurance would have been given. However such an assurance would not have been accurate and the obvious flaw in this argument is that it is premised on the “reasonable builder” being dishonest. It is clearly inconsistent to argue that a Council inspector is entitled to rely on the hypothetical builder being simultaneously competent and...