Search Results

1. LCRO 61/2024 VO and EO v Law Firm A and Ors (16 April 2025) [pdf, 319 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2025] NZLCRO 049 Ref: LCRO 61/2024 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee BETWEEN VO and EO Applicants AND LAW FIRM A, OW, PN, EW, WR and VK Respondents DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been chang...

2. Deliu v New Zealand Law Society and National Standards Committee (Second Recusal Application) [2013] NZHRRT 12 [pdf, 122 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2013] NZHRRT 12 Reference No. HRRT 014/11 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN FRANK DELIU PLANTIFF AND NEW ZEALAND LAW SOCIETY DEFENDANT Reference No. HRRT 045/11 BETWEEN FRANK DELIU PLANTIFF AND LAWYERS NATIONAL STANDARDS COMMITTEE DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND Before: RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Mr GJ Cook JP, Member Ms PJ Davies, Member Mr F Deliu in person Mr WC Pyke fo...

3. LCRO 12/2018 NH and EW v TL and [KT Law] (17 February 2020) [pdf, 102 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2020] NZLCRO 17 LCRO 12/2018 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [City] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN NH and EW Applicants AND TL and [KT Law] Respondents DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introducti...

4. LCRO 190/2019 GK and UL v MH and [RT] Law Limited (19 May 2020) [pdf, 117 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2020] NZLCRO 70 Ref: LCRO 190/2019 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN GK AND UL Applicants AND MH AND [RT] LAW LIMITED Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Int...

5. LCRO 53/2021 ST on behalf of the Executors of the Estate of KK v QM, WP, RS and DJ of ABC Law Limited (9 March 2022) [pdf, 274 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2022] NZLCRO 023 Ref: LCRO 53/2021 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination by [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN ST on behalf of the Executors of the Estate of KK Applicant AND QM, WP, RS and DJ of ABC LAW LIMITED Respondents The names and identifying details of the parties i...

6. Coast Law - Allotment 266A3C2 Waimana Parish Block (2014) 103 Waiariki MB 270 (103 WAR 270) [pdf, 166 KB]

   103 Waiariki MB 270 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20140005107 UNDER Section 131, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Allotment 266A3C2 Waimana Parish Block Coast Law Applicant Hearing: 4 June 2014, 99 Waiariki MB 244-248 (Heard at Opotiki) Appearances: T Jaram, for the applicant Judgment: 09 September 2014 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF DEPUTY CHIEF JUDGE C L FOX

7. BORA-Vet-advice_-SIGNED-with-coda-Firearms-Prohibition-Order-Legislation-Amendment-Bill-Consistency-to-NZBORA-15-February-2024-for-publication.pdf [pdf, 5 MB]

   .. Te Tari Ture "?. o te Karauna 1 ( Crown Law 15 February 2024 Attorney-General Advice on the consistency of the Firearms Prohibition Order Legislation Amendment Bill with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 Our Ref: ATT395/399 Summary 1. This briefing provides our view that the Firearms Prohibition Order Legislation Amendment Bill (PCO 26013/5.0) (the Bill) as currently drafted is inconsistent with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 in one respect. 2. Specific...

8. Form-1-Leave-can-be-Pre-trial-1st-or-2nd-question-of-law.doc [doc, 45 KB]

   ...[……………………………………………………………………………………………..name], the applicant, give you notice that I apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal against the decision described above on the grounds set out below, and I give answers as follows to the following questions: 1. (a) Is any lawyer now acting for you? ………………………………………………………………………………………….. (b) If so, give his o...

9. Government Response to Te Aka Matua o te Ture | Law Commission Report: The Use of DNA in Criminal Investigations | Te Whakamahi i te Ira Tangata i ngā Mātai Taihara [pdf, 825 KB]

   ...despite the regime’s significant impact on the rights and interests of Māori  does not adequately protect privacy and human rights even though the regime is intrusive by nature  has gaps, resulting in uncertain legal standing  has legislative design issues, making it difficult to understand and apply, and  does not provide for adequate independent oversight and governance. 2v3hev5ds4 2021-05-25 10:06:07 2 4. I consider the combined effect of these issues...

10. LCRO 103/2021 & LCRO 58/2022, LCRO 104/2021 and LCRO 105/2021 GS v ABC Ltd & HY, [Law Firm A] v ABC Ltd & HY and SW v [Area] Standards Committee [X] (24 November 2022) [pdf, 595 KB]

    LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2022] NZLCRO 126 Ref: LCRO 103/2021 LCRO 058/2022 LCRO 104/2021 LCRO 105/2021 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN GS Applicant AND AND BETWEEN AND AND BETWEEN AND ABC LTD and HY Responden