Search Results

1. OWRUG - M Curran - Supplementary - Appendix 1 - 14 May 2021 [pdf, 352 KB]

   2/13/2019 Open Government Data Initiative http://data.orc.govt.nz/Reporting/ConsentReport/Search/2001.721 1/1 Consent No. 2001.721DISCHARGE TO WATER PERMIT Persuant to Section 104A of the Resource Management Act 1991, the Otago Regional Council grants consent to: Name: Omakau Area Irrigation Company Limited To discharge water to the Manuherikia River at Falls Dam for the purpose of flow augmentation. Location of activity: Manuherikia River at Falls Dam, at the northern end of Fiddlers Fl...

2. Minute Further Directions on Resumed Hearing 28 June - 3 July [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...released for the purpose of case management. Further expert conferences The court has previously directed two further expert conferences with joint witness statements to be filed at their conclusion. Conferencing is on the topics of: (a) deemed permits and associated rights of priorities;1 and (b) Objective 10A1.1, Schedule 10A and related provisions. 1 Indeed, this has now been filed today. 2 Joint witness statement in relation to deemed permits and associated prior...

3. 2021-02-05 Martin Graeme memorandum evidence [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...in New Zealand. 12. From February 2014 to June 2020 I held the voluntary position of Independent Chairman of the Lindis Catchment Group, leading the Group through the Otago Regional Council Plan Change 5A processes and replacement of the Deemed Permit (Mining Privileges) of the Lindis Catchment. 13. Since July 2018 I have assisted the Manuherikia Catchment and Otago Water Resource Users to navigate the Otago Regional Council’s cascade of suggested plan Memorandum of G N Ma...

4. [2020] NZEnvC 150 Kingston Lifestyle Properties Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 588 KB]

   ...submissions by KLP). Application for declaration [3] KLP filed its original application for declaration on 6 July 2020 accompanied by a (since withdrawn)1 affidavit of Mr TA Grace. KLP's application is made on the grounds that the Activities are permitted activities under the PDP, any previous rules in relation to the operation of the Kingston Flyer under the ODP are inoperative and the Activities are not for commercial purposes.2 [4] The application for declaration outlines h...

5. 2021-10-27 Trustpower - MOC - re point of clarification [pdf, 504 KB]

   ...Deep Stream in Schedule 10A.5.1 and the omission of Black Rock Race. 2. Clarification is sought as it appears to counsel that the Court may have inadvertently treated Black Rock Race as an activity not previously authorised by way of a deemed permit and Deep Stream as an activity authorised by a deemed permit. If so, this is not correct. 3. At [329] the Court noted “Given the paucity of policy in the regional plan we will not amend Policy 10A.2.2 to allow Trustpower to seek long...

6. 2021-07-05 MFE- Closing Submissions [pdf, 551 KB]

   ...adverse environmental effects was low. Ms Dicey discussed possible amendments to the Objective to meet this concern. A revised Objective as described by Ms Dicey, and reviewed by Mr Ensor, could be: 10.A.1.2 Enable activities authorised by deemed permits or water permits for takes and uses of freshwater expiring prior to 31 December 2025 to continue operating during the transition period at their existing scale and consistent with historical use. 9 10A.1.3 Ensure that activ...

7. [2013] NZEmpC 221 Bali v SRG Holdings Ltd [pdf, 79 KB]

   ...Judgment: 29 November 2013 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M E PERKINS [1] Mr Bali was formerly employed by SRG Holdings Limited t/a Super Value (SRG). [2] The plaintiff is an Indian citizen who came to New Zealand seeking a permit to remain here as a resident. Mr Bali has family in New Zealand. Mr Bali managed to procure a work permit and was then able to take up employment with SRG. He held the position of Duty Manager and Checkout Supervisor with that compan...

8. Williamson v Tangilanu [2012] NZIACDT 13 (28 March 2012) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...[11.1] Mr Hakaumotu had been her client since 2006, and the amount of $2,500 was the total of fees paid for her work to date. [11.2] She had done work other than applying for a visitor’s visa, and taking instructions to apply for a residence permit. She had also tried to get permits under section 35A of the Immigration Act 1987. [11.3] She never advertised a fee of $600. [11.4] She informed Mr Hakaumotu on 9 October 2010 she would assist him with his residence application without...

9. [2021] NZIACDT 16 - EM v Yong (13 July 2021) [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...her husband. His business practice was to permit his unlicensed staff to deal with the client. This practice was found to be intentional, though it was accepted that he was not aware it was in breach of the Code. He had wrongly thought it was permitted, as such a practice is lawful for Australian migration work. [13] It was not accepted that Mr Yong had been deceptive. There was no evidence that he had received the fee knowing or suspecting that his client could not successfully...

10. McCarthy - Utakura 9 (2008) 124 Whangarei MB 84 (124 WH 84) [pdf, 205 KB]

    ...is amended remains to be seen. In the meantime, the Courtnonnally approaches this anomoly in a couple of ways. [9] First, the Court may grant an occupation order in favour of the 1rustees of a whanau 1rust in anticipation of the 1rust granting a licence to occupy to '/he beneficiary. This is less than ideal. A licence to occupy provides less certainty than an occupation order. It can only operate for a set timeframe, is personal to the licensee and cannot be succeeded to on the...