Search Results

1. [2025] NZIACDT 13 – HG v Liu (18 February 2025) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...based on employment of the complainant as a truck driver’s offsider for a named cartage company working on recovery work following extreme weather events. The visa was approved by Immigration NZ on 24 March 2023. It was valid for six months and permitted employment in recovery work for any employer. [7] The complainant arrived in New Zealand on 8 April 2023. He never met the employer named in the visa application and was offered no recovery work. Decision of the Tribunal [8...

2. [2025] NZIACDT 18 – YI v Liu (27 February 2025) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...based on employment of the complainant as a construction labourer for a named property company working on recovery work following extreme weather events. The visa was approved by Immigration NZ on 18 March 2023. It was valid for six months and permitted employment in recovery work for any employer. [7] The complainant arrived in New Zealand on 4 April 2023. He never met the employer named in the visa application and was offered no recovery work. Decision of the Tribunal [8] I...

3. [2025] NZIACDT 19 – DH v Liu (28 February 2025) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...based on employment of the complainant as a construction labourer for a named property company working on recovery work following extreme weather events. The visa was approved by Immigration NZ on 8 April 2023. It was valid for six months and permitted employment in recovery work for any employer. [7] The complainant arrived in New Zealand on 10 April 2023. He never met the employer named in the visa application and was offered no recovery work. Decision of the Tribunal [8] I...

4. [2025] NZIACDT 16 – TX v Liu (26 February 2025) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...based on employment of the complainant as a construction labourer for a named property company working on recovery work following extreme weather events. The visa was approved by Immigration NZ on 10 March 2023. It was valid for six months and permitted employment in recovery work for any employer. [7] The complainant arrived in New Zealand on 21 March 2023. He never met the employer named in the visa application and was offered no recovery work. He managed to arrange some work...

5. [2025] NZIACDT 15 – ZJ v Liu (26 February 2025) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...based on employment of the complainant as a construction labourer for a named property company working on recovery work following extreme weather events. The visa was approved by Immigration NZ on 10 March 2023. It was valid for six months and permitted employment in recovery work for any employer. [7] The complainant arrived in New Zealand on 21 March 2023. He never met the employer named in the visa application and was offered no recovery work. He managed to arrange about two...

6. [2025] NZIACDT 17 – IX v Liu (26 February 2025) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...based on employment of the complainant as a construction labourer for a named property company working on recovery work following extreme weather events. The visa was approved by Immigration NZ on 10 March 2023. It was valid for six months and permitted employment in recovery work for any employer. [7] The complainant arrived in New Zealand on 4 April 2023. He never met the employer named in the visa application and was offered no recovery work. Decision of the Tribunal [8] I...

7. CAC20007 v Jarman [2015] NZREADT 66 [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...constructive discussions as to what penalty orders might be appropriate in this case. The parties agree that, in all the circumstances, the following orders would appropriately reflect the misconduct admitted: [a] An order cancelling Ms Jarman’s licence, under s.110(2)(b) of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 (Act); and [b] A fine in the range $5,000-$10,000, under s.100(2)(f) of the Act. [3] Should we agree that the above orders are appropriate, the prosecution does not seek any fur...

8. [2024] NZREADT 05 CAC v Pang (6 March 2024) [pdf, 227 KB]

   ...it thinks fit, make 1 or more of the orders specified in subsection (2). (2) The orders are as follows: (a) 1 or more of the orders that can be made by a Committee under section 93 (except under section 93(1)(ha)): (b) an order cancelling the licence of the licensee and, in the case of a licensee that is a company, also cancelling the licence of any officer of the company: (c) an order suspending the licence of the licensee for a period not exceeding 24 months and, in the case of a...

9. [2021] NZACDT 14 - YC v Wan (29 June 2021) [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...Wan, a licensed immigration adviser, is a director of PJ Education & Immigration Services Ltd (the consultancy), of Auckland. At the material time, he supervised Ms Han, then a provisionally licensed adviser, but who has since obtained a full licence. [6] The complainant, a national of China, had been in New Zealand on student or work visas since 2014. She contacted Ms Han in early June 2019 as she wished to apply for an essential skills work visa. [7] A written client agr...

10. Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 403) v Drever [2016] NZREADT 72 [pdf, 131 KB]

    ...examples, see Complaints Assessment Committee v Khan [2011] NZREADT 11; Complaints Assessment Committee v Raj [2013] NZREADT 52; Complaints Assessment Committee v Ferguson [2013] NZREADT 30. [c] Cancellation or suspension of the licensee’s licence; [d] An order that the licensee not perform any supervisory functions until authorised to do so; [e] An order that a licensee’s employment (or engagement if the licensee is an independent contractor) be terminated and that no agent...