Search Results

1. Transcript (weeks 7 & 8 Dunedin) [pdf, 4.7 MB]

   ...asking you about that and then the dam question? 25 A. Yes, so in terms of the dam question we’ve been in communication with Mr Page and highlighted the dams on which the Court and the Council would be interested in understanding the suite of permits that apply to each of them, so a list of dams was sent through to Mr Page. Over the weekend there has been a supplementary brief filed by Mr Curran that 30 4 OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL v Ngā RUNUNGA & Ors Notes of Evidence ENV...

2. [2019] NZEnvC 058 Maehl v Lenihan [pdf, 5.1 MB]

   ...of the now operative Auckland Unitary Plan, the removal of this Kauri (and any other on the property) was permissible. [10] For reasons we will go into shortly, we have concluded that the plan is very clear that the removal of such trees is a permitted activity. This of course in terms of s314(1 )(a)(ii) is not an entire answer to the issue given that there remains jurisdiction for the court to intercede in appropriate cases not withstanding that the activity may hold a consent or...

3. Trustpower – EiC – N I Foran (5 Feb 2021) [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...to the Regional Water Plan (PC7) and the implications this will have on its renewable electricity generation schemes. Trustpower’s applications for replacement consents for its four races are subject to PC7, as are applications for new water permits in respect of the policy direction on term of consent, for example enhancements to Deep Stream HEPS. 1.4 Trustpower is concerned with the way PC7 provides for the consenting of hydro-electricity power generation given the focus of PC7...

4. Marshall v Ratu - Whangape Lot 65B Sec 2A Block (2021) 227 Waikato Maniapoto MB 148 (227 WMN 148) [pdf, 400 KB]

   ...all of these matters, I consider it is just and equitable to grant relief to Mrs Marshall. Can I grant the relief sought by Mrs Marshall? [47] Section 325(1) sets out the orders I can make. Mrs Marshall seeks an order per s 325(1)(c), which permits the making of an order to the following effect: (c) giving the owner of the land affected by, or the land intended for, a wrongly placed structure or any other person with an estate or interest in either of those pieces of land, the...

5. 2021-03-21 Minute - PC7 - Case Management Directions [pdf, 163 KB]

   ...[1] This Minute is issued in response to: (a) the proceedings to date in relation to Plan Change 7 (PC7); (b) the supplementary evidence of Tom de Pelsemaeker dated 24 March 2021 in relation to the exercise of priority to water under Deemed Permit; and (c) other supplementary evidence filed by parties in response to the substantive amendments to PC7 recommended by Mr de Pelsemaeker. 2 Supplementary evidence of Mr T de Pelsemaeker concerning exercise of priority to water...

6. OWRUG - EiC - J E Jones (5 Feb 2021) [pdf, 801 KB]

   ...few sources of irrigation water on our farm that is crucial to the farm’s viability. We farm over 5200ha and run approximately 13,000 stock units. Approximately 350ha is under irrigation. 6. In recent years we have been replacing our water permits. We still have one more application for two permits to lodge. That application will be lodged before the end of March 2021. 2 BI-1035600-2-286-V2 Foxes and Little Meg Creeks Figure 1: This is Little Meg, loo...

7. [2018] NZEnvC 004 P & S Aitchison and Wellington City Council v H & D Walmsley and Walmsley Enterprises Limited [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...situated) supported the application and joined the proceedings for that purpose. [5] The structure had been the subject of an earlier decision of this Court in 2015, when Judge Thompson's division of the Court concluded that it was not a permitted activity under the Wellington District Plan. That decision issued on 17 September 20153 (the 2015 Decision). The Walmsleys appealed the 2015 Decision to the High Court. At the time of issue of the 2016 Decision, the High Court appeal...

8. 2021-03-16 ORC - email - primary sector expert conferencing data sets and scenarios [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...storage on farm. Good record that  demonstrates compliance with l/s  consent limit, but variable pattern of  taking.  Omakau Area  Irrigation  Company  Manuherekia   2001.702  (WM0122)  Mainstem Manuherekia take.  Irrigation Scheme.  One meter, one permit.  Example of a complete date set where  the data should be fairly similar.   Ida Valley  Irrigation  Poolburn  2001.590.V1  (WM0071)     One meter one permit examples ...

9. BE v TU Ltd [2021] NZDT 1568 (29 July 2021) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...area and can be accessed by the same entrance and exit. The [Supermarket] carparks are painted white, the area BE parked in is painted yellow. There are numerous signs in the yellow painted carparks variously saying, ‘permit parking only’, all unpermitted vehicles parked within yellow lines will be towed’ and ‘tow away zone’. BE says there was nothing to say what a permitted vehicle was and the reason he parked in the yellow painted area was because he was not aware he could not...

10. XU v I Ltd [2023] NZDT 621 (2 November 2023) [pdf, 196 KB]

    ...that he saw the diagonal yellow lines and the letters ‘LZ’ and assumed that the space by the rear door of the [building] was a loading zone where he could park temporarily while he unloaded the car. There were no signs saying that parking was not permitted to contradict this assumption. 7. The land at the back of the [building] is owned by ES, however, he does not own the [building]. ES gave evidence that he does not know who painted the yellow lines and the letters ‘LZ’ and �€...