Search Results

1. Bidois v Trustees of Te Rimu Trust - Tokata A14 and other blocks (2013) 31 Tarawhiti MB 95 (31 TRW 95) [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...the lease. [2] The applicants also raise various concerns as to the administration of the Trust including issues over proper process, the future use and development of the land, the rights of beneficial owners, proposals for owners to receive a licence of the land and related matters. [3] Richard Clarke, the chairperson of the Trust, says that while the trustees would strongly prefer that the issues be resolved between the trustees, both he and Hepa Akuhata Brown do not 31 Taira...

2. [2024] NZEnvC 259 Williams v Nelson City Council [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...as follows: The hedge along the south property boundary Flat 2 DP 17983, Pt Sec 1085 SO 112 283A Rutherford Street, Nelson [5] The notice gave the following reasons: The hedge along the south boundary of 283A Rutherford Street exceeds the permitted height of 1.8 metres. The hedge must be pruned to comply with the relevant rule, or a resource consent must be sought to authorise the non- compliance. [6] In those and other respects, the abatement notice accords with relevant RMA...

3. Musese v Min [2013] NZIACDT 24 (04 April 2013) [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...assigned this file along with 10 other New Zealand applications from the South African office. [20.3] On 14 September 2011, Mr Min was reviewing the file and was having difficulty identifying what timeframe would apply. Mr Min was concerned that a work permit was required, as residence (which had been the approach taken) would take too long. [20.4] On 15 September 2011, Mr Min first made contact with Mr Musese by email. [20.5] On 17 September 2011, Mr Musese told Mr Min he was not sat...

4. [2020] NZIACDT 17 - XA v Hill (10 March 2020) [pdf, 304 KB]

   ...the adviser, used an unlicensed employee within her office, her life partner, to engage with her client, the complainant, and also to do immigration work that only a licensed adviser is allowed to perform. Furthermore, that she was negligent in permitting incorrect information regarding the complainant’s work experience to be provided to Immigration New Zealand. [2] The essential issue to consider is one of credibility, being whether Ms Hill was the effective author of all the te...

5. OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL v NGA RUNANGA - NOE 10-13 May 2021.pdf [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   ...needing to be 15 resilient against both external influences such as pandemics, but also increasingly influences closer to home in the form of regulations from short sighted regional councils. I have spent hundreds of hours engaged in the deemed permit renewal process for our community and the minimum flow setting process. And now we are here, talking of short term, low cost 20 rollovers. There is nothing low cost about this process and short term holds a higher cost than many of u...

6. [2024] NZEnvC 178 Te Raranga a Te Kuihi Trust v Kaipara District Council [pdf, 3.2 MB]

   ...400m2 minimum. b. 500m2 average. 2. Every allotment can contain a rectangle of at least 8m by 15m. 4. The allotment contains an identified building area of at least 100m2 within which a residential unit can be built so there is compliance with the permitted activity standards for the General Residential Area. 5. A No Complaints covenant regarding existing or permitted activity land based primary production activities is proposed to be registered on the Certificates of Title of allotm...

7. [2020] NZEnvC 102 Public and Population Health Unit of the Northland District Health Board v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 425 KB]

   ...operation. [8] However by the time of the Consent Memorandum on 22nd May 2020, the parties had not been able to agree on the approach in respect of fumigants. The issue [9] The Regional Council originally included discharge of fumigants as a permitted activity and the appeal filed by the Public and Population Health Unit for the Northland District Health Board, sought to have these as full discretionary activities. The Council subsequently acknowledged the difficulties in relation...

8. [2017] NZEnvC 091 Granger Forrester and Caradoc Davies v Peninsula Holdings Trust and Steve Clearwater Contracting Limited [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...addition to seeking the cessation of any quarrying activities, that: (a) The respondents remediate the areas of the property where there has been quarrying or excavation or related activity (including removal of over-burden) outside the boundaries / permitted area for such activity, by replacing as far as possible the material removed, and re-contouring as closely as possible to reinstate the previous natural contours of the land and re-grassing and re-planting such areas; and (...

9. Guo v Culpan (Agent) [2017] NZHRRT 57 [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...(2) PLAINTIFF’S SEARCH ORDER APPLICATION1 Background [1] Ms Guo is a former patient of Dr Culpan. On 28 August 2015 she requested a copy of her medical file. It is alleged Dr Culpan did not respond to this request within the timeline permitted by s 40 of the Privacy Act 1993. A second allegation is that when the requested information was released, that release was incomplete. Dr Culpan responds that Ms Guo was provided with a copy of her full medical file on 29 September 201...

10. [2024] NZEnvC 065 Van Den Brink Group v Waikato District Council [pdf, 673 KB]

    ...Introduction [1] This consent determination relates to an appeal against the decisions of Waikato District Council on the Proposed Waikato District Plan (PDP) in relation to submissions by the Appellant seeking amendments to the height of buildings permitted within the Whangarata business park in the General Industrial Zone (GIZ) at Tuakau. Background [2] The Appellant is the owner of several properties located within the Whangarata Business Park in Tuakau. The original submiss...