[2017] NZEmpC 54 Marx v Southern Cross Campus Board of Trustees [pdf, 83 KB]
...reasonable contribution to its costs. As was observed in Scarborough v Micron Security Products Ltd: 4 While some latitude may generally be expected in such circumstances, it does not provide an impenetrable shield in relation to costs, or a licence to pursue hopeless claims or scandalous allegations with impunity. If it were otherwise it would place the opposing party, and the administration of justice generally, in an invidious position. [10] Mrs Marx says that she is a pensi...