[2010] NZEmpC 17 Secretary for Justice v Dodd [pdf, 17 KB]
...evidence is intended to go a little further and address a factual matter raised by the evidence of the plaintiff’s witnesses which Judge Roberts says he believes involved him. [4] It is correct, as Mr Sherriff submits, that the Court will not permit witnesses to second guess the justification for the dismissal by giving their opinions as to how they consider a fair and reasonable employer would have acted in all the circumstances. An attempt to do so in the early days of s 103A,...