Search Results

1. [2024] NZEnvC 242 Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Incorporated v Thames-Coromandel District Council [pdf, 16 MB]

   ...forestry in the PDP as Appendix 9. (b) Associated amendments to the rules in section 29 of the PDP, principally a new Rule 4 for the clearance of indigenous vegetation associated with a commercial forestry activity. [6] New Rule 4 creates a permitted activity for clearing indigenous vegetation associated with a commercial forestry activity that is subject to the Resource Management (National Environmental Standards for Commercial Forestry) Regulations 2017 (NES), provided that...

2. [2024] NZEmpC 107 Pacific Insulation Ltd v Lagera & Anor [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...advised that its systems did not allow bespoke payment policies to apply to individual customers. The parties had therefore agreed that one of the first respondent’s accounts, his “Go” account, could be released and hold $10,000 for his permitted expenses. [4] After that alteration to the orders previously made, the Court dealt with variations to the earlier timetabling orders.5 Seven variations were recorded and the parties were provided with leave to seek further direction...

3. [2024] NZEmpC 90 Pacific Insulation Ltd v Lagera & Anor [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...advised that its systems do not allow bespoke payment policies to apply to individual customers. [5] The parties have therefore agreed that one of the first respondent’s accounts, being his “Go” account, can be released and hold $10,000 for his permitted expenses. [6] An order amending the freezing order is accordingly made as requested, allowing the first respondent to access that account for his permitted expenses. [7] The parties also seek variations to the timetabling orde...

4. LCRO 126-2017 PC v The Committee [pdf, 281 KB]

   ...register [following which] indefeasibility of title takes effect” Mr PC’s contravention of r 2.5 “was significant”. (i) By completing his certificate and submitting the transfer instrument for registration, Mr PC had “misused his LINZ licence and digital certificate”. (j) It was not open to Mr PC “to have relied on the directions from his colleague, albeit a senior colleague whom Mr PC says was his direct superior”. This is because e-dealing certifications, as wit...

5. Haira v Haira - Kapenga A7 (2016) 149 Waiariki MB 259 (149 WAR 259) [pdf, 340 KB]

   ...be used in the context of this application to make the orders as sought. He argued that though s 237 may enable the Court to determine ownership of the buildings it is unlikely that it could be used to enable the Court to make orders as to what licence to occupy arrangements there are, or that buildings be removed from the land. Such orders, Mr Sharp contended, are related to property rather that “in respect of trusts generally”. [16] Mr Sharp further submitted that in Mikaere...

6. Rātima v Sullivan - Tataraakina C Trust (2017) 64 Tākitimu MB 121 (64 TKT 121) [pdf, 874 KB]

   ............................................................................................... [102] Discussion ........................................................................................................................ [109] Should the earlier Poronui licence findings be re-visited? .......................................... [115] Are the former trustees entitled to indemnity for any costs paid in their defence? .. [117] Applicant’s submissions .................................

7. [2023] NZEnvC 259 Dromgool v Minister for Land Information [pdf, 493 KB]

   ...lines, wires, cranes, drilling rigs, Vehicles, plant, tools and machinery and all material and items required for the purpose of exercising any of the rights under this Easement; 1.1.6 “Grantee” means Top Energy Limited, its successors and permitted transferees, assigns, lessees, sublessees and licensees together with the Grantee’s servants, agents, employees, workers, invitees, licensees and contractors with or without vehicles, machinery or equipment. 1.1.7 “Grantor” m...

8. 2021-05-18 Transcript (up until end of day 28 - 14.05.2021) [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   ...JUDGE BORTHWICK ........................................................... 1244 CROSS-EXAMINATION: MR MAW .............................................................................................. 1251 EXHIBIT 1 PRODUCED – COPY OF DEEMED PERMIT CONSENT NUMBER 2002.448 IN NAME OF PERMIT HOLDER CARRICK IRRIGATION COMPANY LTD ............................. 1253 RE-EXAMINATION: MR PAGE – NIL ..............................................................................................

9. 2021-05-18 Transcript (up until end of day 28 - 14.05.2021) [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   ...JUDGE BORTHWICK ........................................................... 1244 CROSS-EXAMINATION: MR MAW .............................................................................................. 1251 EXHIBIT 1 PRODUCED – COPY OF DEEMED PERMIT CONSENT NUMBER 2002.448 IN NAME OF PERMIT HOLDER CARRICK IRRIGATION COMPANY LTD ............................. 1253 RE-EXAMINATION: MR PAGE – NIL ..............................................................................................

10. Transcript (week 6 Cromwell) [pdf, 2.8 MB]

    .......................................................................................................... 1242 CROSS-EXAMINATION: MR MAW .............................................................................................. 1243 EXHIBIT 1 PRODUCED – COPY OF DEEMED PERMIT CONSENT NUMBER 2002.448 IN NAME OF PERMIT HOLDER CARRICK IRRIGATION COMPANY LTD ............................. 1254 RE-EXAMINATION: MR PAGE – NIL ...................................................................