Search Results

1. [2008] NZEmpC WC 1A/08 Progressive Meats Ltd v Meat and related Trades Workers Union of Aoteaoroa Inc [pdf, 17 KB]

   ...addressing two questions. [3] Where, however, a timetable has been made, it should not be varied (including being added to) by a party unilaterally, at least without leave. The plaintiff did not seek leave, let alone set out why it should be permitted to file further submissions. [4] In these circumstances I propose to permit the plaintiff to be heard on one element of its additional submissions but not the other. After the plaintiff had made its original submissions,...

2. OWRUG - EiC - H S Mackenzie (4 Feb 2021) [pdf, 11 MB]

   ...room of my business. It provides summer fodder for livestock and also supplementary feed for long cold winters. To date we have invested upwards of $3.5 million on this development. 2 PP-1035600-2-195-V1 8. I appreciate that KCL’s new permits are not subject to PC7. My concern is for other farmers who are not yet through the reconsenting process. PC7 has the potential to erode years of hard work put in by catchment groups (like ours) to secure better environmental out...

3. Felicity Boyd - Revised Policy Drafting dated 9 November 2021 - PDF version [pdf, 141 KB]

   7.D.4 Provide for the restricted discretionary consenting of any discharge under section 12.C: (a) Where changes to land management practices or infrastructure have not been sufficient to meet permitted activity rules; or (b) As part of the development of technology or innovative practices associated with improving water quality; or (c) From a short-term activity with short-term adverse effects; and the duration will not exceed: (1) Two years for discharges from a short-term activity...

4. [2019] NZEnvC 127 Taylor v Selwyn District Council [pdf, 3.4 MB]

   ...reached an agreement (the 'amended proposal') which includes amendments to the flight paths, hours of operation, total number of helicopter movements, GPS and log book records being held, bund construction and planting and the concession of permitted activity helicopter movements and inclusion of visiting helicopters. [3] The court has now read and considered the following filed in support of the orders sought: (a) memorandum of counsel for the respondent, dated 27 May 2...

5. 2022-09-Guide-to-the-MVDT-for-traders-v2-Apr-23.pdf [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...because the MVDT staff may need to contact you at any time up to the hearing. Right to appear at hearings The parties to a claim have the right to attend and be heard at any hearing of that claim. In appropriate circumstances, the adjudicator may permit a party to be represented at the hearing by someone else. This is always necessary where a party is a company. Parties cannot be represented at the hearing by anyone who is or has been a lawyer or who has regularly been involved i...

6. Graeme-GLEESON.pdf [pdf, 135 KB]

   ...Resource Management Act 1991. 3 4. I am interested in all the proceedings. 5. I am particularly interested in the following issues: a. Any relief sought that seeks to replace alter or remove the provision of an appropriate permitted activity pathway and flexibility for mixed livestock (sheep, beef-cattle and deer, but not limited to) low intensity farming, included as provided for in farm environment plans. b. The ‘grandparenting’ of nitrogen allocation...

7. BORA Relationships Statutory References Bill [pdf, 65 KB]

   ...the Human Rights Act 1993, and do not appear to be justifiable in terms of s 5 of the Bill of Rights Act. 2. Further, the amendment to s 35(2) of the Immigration Act 1987 in Schedule 14 of the Bill, which provides that the Minister may decline the permit application of a person under 17 years of age if there is no parental consent, appears to be inconsistent with the freedom from discrimination on the grounds of age affirmed by s 19(1) of the Bill of Rights Act and s 21(1)(i) of the Huma...

8. BORA Family Courts Matters Bill [pdf, 281 KB]

   ...publication of reports of proceedings); 4. Generally, where the Bill amends provisions regulating who may attend Family Court hearings it provides that officers of the Court, parties to a proceeding, lawyers representing parties, witnesses, persons permitted by the Judge to be present as support persons for a party, and accredited news media reporters may be present. Discretion is granted to Family Court Judges to permit other persons to be present. 5. The provisions regarding publicati...

9. [2017] NZEnvC 038 Gravatt v Pierau [pdf, 547 KB]

   ...the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan took legal effect from 19 August 2016, replacing non-identical temporary activity provisions in the Auckland Council District Plan (Rodney Section) 2011. Gravatt Family Trust v Pierau 2 C: The relevant permitted temporary activity rules in the PAUP cannot be read together with the replaced Rodney Section rules for the purpose of calculation of numbers of days for which an activity would be permitted in any 12 month period. D: PAUP Rule E...

10. ENV-2016-AKL-000188 Lenihan v Auckland Council [pdf, 3.4 MB]

    ...90% of all property owners in the Titirangi Laingholm area who have sites under 4000sqm. In fact the majority have sites of 1000sqm or less and are generally 15-18m wide. With a 15m wide site, a reduction of a 6m Yard on each side leaves you a permitted development area of exactly 3m! With a 18m wide site, a development area of 6m occurs. Neither are suitable for new dwellings or additions to existing dwellings. Furthermore on a steep site development going from 3m back to 10m back...