Search Results

1. Ratana v Tihi - Ruatoki B Section 23 and others [2021] Maori Appellate Court MB 290 (2021 APPEAL 290) [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...case, the tripartite deed is relevant as to purpose. [27] The tripartite deed is an agreement between Hare and his wife, Housing Corp, and the trustees who administered the land. Under the deed: (a) The trustees granted to Hare and his wife a licence to occupy a house site on the land; (b) Housing Corp granted to Hare and his wife a loan to build a house on the site; and (c) The deed regulated the repayment of the loan, what would occur on default, and the rights of the res...

2. Stone v Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 408) & Lim [2017] NZREADT 23 [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...Auckland, which she alleged had sent her only one-third of a workbook required for a Verifiable Continuing Education Course. She contacted the TAFE College as she was concerned that if she did not have the workbook, it could affect her agent’s licence. She said she did not receive a response from the TAFE College until she had voluntarily suspended her licence on 11 December 2015.2 The Tribunal notes that Ms Lim revived her licence on 15 January 2016. [7] In the same complain...

3. [2020] NZREADT 20 - AJS Rental Ltd - penalty (1 May 2020) [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...As relevant to the present case the Tribunal may: [a] Make any of the orders that a Complaints Assessment Committee may impose under s 93 of the Act; [b] Impose a fine of up to $30,000; [c] Order cancellation or suspension of the licensee’s licence; Submissions [14] Ms Woolley submitted for the Committee that the aim of deterrence would appropriately be met if AJS were censured, and ordered to pay a fine of between $20,000 and $25,000. She submitted that such a penalty would...

4. [2021] NZREADT 30 - Kan (17 June 2021) [pdf, 251 KB]

   ...interview. She also recorded that Mr Kan’s decision to withdraw from selling or leasing real estate was a matter for him, personally, and that the complaint process would continue regardless. [12] The Tribunal was advised that Mr Kan’s current licence expired on 31 March 2020 and was not renewed. The charge [13] The Committee laid the charge against Mr Kan on 26 March 2021. The particulars set out in the charge reflect the narration of background facts set out earlier, inc...

5. AF on behalf of Department of Labour v ZR LCRO 111/2012 (31 January 2014) [pdf, 80 KB]

   ...[4] This review relates to the conduct of ZR when assisted an immigration 2 consultancy business known as GV Services. It appears that her assistance was required because the principal of the business (Ms HT) did not have the requisite licence to act as an immigration adviser due to a (at that time) recent change in the law. To enable the business to continue, the assistance of ZR was sought to provide immigration advice. Because ZR was a lawyer she was exempt from the re...

6. T Ltd v G Ltd [2024] NZDT 519 (2 July 2024) [pdf, 156 KB]

   ...agreement with G Ltd in 2020 he had hoped he would be able to grow the business over several years in this region. He said he spent money on advertising both locally and nationally. He said the original distributor agreements gave him an exclusive licence in this region. He says that the new Authorised Reseller agreements do not offer that and are very different to the agreement he had with G Ltd. TD also referred to issues that had arisen over the years regarding availability of product...

7. Real Estate Agents Authority v Wallace [2016] NZREADT 71 [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...Committees. [42] We accept Ms Copeland’s submission that the misconduct charge which we have found proved relates to serious offending. Ms Copeland submitted that the appropriate starting point for a penalty is cancellation of Ms Wallace’s licence. [43] We have not sought Ms Wallace’s submissions regarding cancellation, although we note that orders for cancellation have been made in similar cases, and the previous finding of misconduct against Ms Wallace would be a relevant f...

8. [2009] NZEmpC AC 6A/09 Bay Milk Distributors Ltd v Jopson [pdf, 41 KB]

   ...found, employees were told that there would be one criterion for redundancies (“last on, first off”), in fact the employer took into account a number of other unannounced factors such as skill levels, abilities to work new rosters, driver’s licence qualifications, customer relationships, and distribution skills. In the particular case of Mr Jopson, the Authority found that the employer took into account, but without advice to the defendant, his presumed inability to work on wee...

9. Tipene - Kaikou Lot 3 13 B2 (2015) 114 Taitokerau MB 45 (114 TTK 45) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...(b) Cancel the reservation: (c) Redefine the purposes for which the reservation is made: (d) Redefine the persons or class of persons for whose use or benefit the reservation is made. (6) No notice under this section shall affect any lease or licence, but no land shall be set apart as a Maori reservation while it is subject to any mortgage or charge. (7) The Court may, by order, vest any Maori reservation in any body corporate or in any 2 or more persons in trust to hold and adm...

10. [2013] NZEmpC 196 Labour Inspector MBIE v Civic City Ltd [pdf, 94 KB]

    ...shareholder in, each of the companies was Mr Ala’a Bader. [11] It has recently come to the Labour Inspector’s notice that Symonds Liquor, situated at 83 Wakefield Street, Auckland, and operated by Rum Limited, has been sold. The statutory liquor licence appears to have been transferred to a company called Beerapu Limited which is owned by Beerapu Venu Mohan Reddy. [12] Another of the respondents, 123J Limited, has recently changed its trading name from “Sky Liquor” to �€...