Search Results

1. Appendix-M3-NZEAN-Legislation-Changes-Requests-.pdf [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...of path could be placed in the one regulation. 2. Including a multi-use path in the current legislation LGA 1974 - Amend Section 11.1A , Use of shared path ● Define bridleways as a type of shared path for horses. There are no shared paths that permit horses, let alone allow for a legal bridleway. ● Allow horses on shared paths in rural areas, and set the priority (give way) rules as per Australia i.e. horses always give way to pedestrians on footpaths. This has been included in Acce...

2. Appendix-A1-NZEAN-Legislation-Changes-Requests-2.pdf [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...of path could be placed in the one regulation. 2. Including a multi-use path in the current legislation LGA 1974 - Amend Section 11.1A , Use of shared path ● Define bridleways as a type of shared path for horses. There are no shared paths that permit horses, let alone allow for a legal bridleway. ● Allow horses on shared paths in rural areas, and set the priority (give way) rules as per Australia i.e. horses always give way to pedestrians on footpaths. This has been included in Acce...

3. [2013] NZEmpC 44 South Pacific Ltd v Tian [pdf, 71 KB]

   ...failure to attend mediation can also be remedied through a direction under s 188(2). [17] These observations apply with equal force in the present case. There is effectively no way for the plaintiff to pursue its challenge if the hearing is not permitted to proceed on a de novo basis. That is because of the scope of the challenge and the intensely factual nature of it. [18] Ms Moncur points out that while these proceedings are before the Court Ms Tian is exposed to ongoing cos...

4. BORA Legal Services Amendment Bill [pdf, 286 KB]

   ...of proceedings under the Immigration Act 1987. The effect of the proposed amendment is to prevent legal aid being granted for the purposes of such proceedings to persons who are: 5.1 In New Zealand only by virtue of being the holder of a temporary permit or a limited purposes permit; 5.2 Outside of New Zealand and not a New Zealand citizen or the holder of a current returning residents visa. 6. This provision arguably raises a prima facie issue of indirect discrimination on the ground...

5. [2015] NZSSAA 12 (13 March 2015) [pdf, 46 KB]

   ...appellant can only be paid a single rate of benefit. This is significant because the total of the United Kingdom pensions received by the appellant and his wife is less than the married rate of New Zealand Superannuation. If XXXX held a residence permit to be in New Zealand the appellant and his wife may be eligible to be paid New Zealand Superannuation at the married rate and it is likely that they would at least receive a partial payment. [12] The New Zealand Superannuation and...

6. [2019] NZEnvC 202 JWA Smith & DV Smith Trust v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 6.4 MB]

   ...costs against the appellant. [4] In May 2019, the land for which the resource consent at issue was held was re­ zoned as part of the Queenstown Lakes District Plan Review process. 2 The new zoning of the site enables commercial activity as a permitted activity, essentially overtaking the appeal in that it enabled as of right many of the activities that were the subject of the Consent. The applicant had in the meantime obtained non-notified consents for the balance of the activity...

7. [2007] NZEmpC AC 50/07 Service and Food Workers Union Inc v Spotless Services (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 30 KB]

   ...the plaintiff is their union which is not entitled to the wages. Ms Wilson said that the union has no standing to pursue wages claims on behalf of its members as it now purports to do. [4] Although Mr Cranney argued that s18(1) and (3) and s236 permit the union to bring wage arrears claims on behalf of its members, I find these only go so far as to permit representation of members by unions in Authority or Court proceedings. Section 131 relied on by Ms Wilson is particular and, by...

8. [2017] NZEmpC 5 Edminstin v Sanford Limited [pdf, 128 KB]

   ...card purchased by the plaintiff and formatted and loaded with data off the Toiler’s Koden plotter device by Steven Frame on or about 6 November 2014 and supplied by Steven Frame to the plaintiff on or about 6 November 2014; iii. permitting any further evidence to be given by and cross- examination of Steven Frame as may be consequential upon the orders above; iv. directing that the defendant produce and make available for the foregoing purposes the Koden memory ca...

9. [2015] NZSSAA 012, 13 March [pdf, 51 KB]

   ...appellant can only be paid a single rate of benefit. This is significant because the total of the United Kingdom pensions received by the appellant and his wife is less than the married rate of New Zealand Superannuation. If XXXX held a residence permit to be in New Zealand the appellant and his wife may be eligible to be paid New Zealand Superannuation at the married rate and it is likely that they would at least receive a partial payment. [12] The New Zealand Superannuation and...

10. 2022-02-11 Appendices 1 - 6 to Statement of Evidence of Kerstin Strauss dated 11 February 2022 (Part 2) [pdf, 19 MB]

    ...continue. It is an offence under S87 of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 to modify or destroy an archaeological site without an authority from Heritage New Zealand irrespective of 149 stellat EA Plans whether the works are permitted or a consent has been issued under the Resource Management Act. Heritage New Zealand Regional archaeologist contact details: Dr Matthew Schmidt Regional Archaeologist Otago/Southland Heritage New Zealand PO Box 5467 Dunedin Ph....