Search Results

1. University of Auckland [pdf, 243 KB]

   ...therefore might have been deprived of an opportunity to be heard; (c) Because Federated Farmers gave its formal consent to the E37 activity rules being amended to make unambiguous provision for viable and non-viable GMO medical vaccines as a permitted activity (as requested by the University in its appeal), which consent was relied upon by the High Court in making directions to amend the relevant rules,2 whether the appeal to this Court is an abuse of process, and vexatious....

2. [2012] NZEmpC 201 QBE Insurance (International) Ltd v Anderson [pdf, 45 KB]

   ...and appearances by all parties were excused. [3] The defendant and the Serious Fraud Office did not file any opposition to the order for discovery sought in the application. [4] Since the filing of the application, the Serious Fraud Office has permitted the plaintiff’s counsel to inspect the documents in issue, which it held. As a result, the plaintiff was able to narrow the request for particular discovery and correspondence with the Serious Fraud Office. [5] On 20 Novem...

3. CAC306 v Murphy & Anor [2015] NZREADT 88 [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...[95] However, a point of concern is the conduct of the defendants from the time the final analysis report was available on 15 October 2013. Between then and the auction, both defendants must be regarded as responsible for prospective bidders being permitted to inspect the property when it was clearly contaminated and a danger to human health. We do not think that the defendants can be exonerated from having insisted that any such person receive a copy of the analysis report prior to tha...

4. [2022] NZEnvC 209 Manawa Energy Limited v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 944 KB]

   ...status of activities involved in developing and operating renewable energy projects. For example, where domestic or small scale developments such as micro wind and hydro have minimal adverse effects on the environment, they can be enabled through permitted activity rules. 3. Move Policy 18.1.5 to sit under the new objective (see 5 and 6 below) as Policy 18.2.4. 4. Delete Policy 18.1.6, as set out below. [R, C, Dj Policy 18.1.6 Provide for the oAgoiAg geAeratioA of electricit'{ fro...

5. Willowridge Developments Ltd & Remarkables Park Ltd - Quinn McEntyre - EIC - 25 February 2022 [pdf, 446 KB]

   ...separate consent authorities. (c) Response to ORC’s s 32 Report in support of PPC8. (d) Response to other pertinent matters that have been raised in the evidence of ORC. (e) Discussion, from a practical perspective, on the proposed new permitted activity rule described in Ms Hunter’s evidence. Overlap between QLDC and ORC Earthworks Controls [9] A comparison of the rule framework between the QLDC’s PDP and ORC’s PPC8 has been provided in Ms Hunter’s evidence. The...

6. [2018] NZEnvC 208 The Wolds Station Limited v Mackenzie District Council [pdf, 5.2 MB]

   ...In fact some of the FBAs approved by the Council are so large that the spirit of the original proposal may have been lost. That needs to be borne in mind in what follows. [6J The primary issue is whether all buildings should be provided for as a permitted activity within FBAs. Since farm buildings are permitted (subject to compliance with standards)'O the issue is, in effect, whether non-farm buildings should be permitted. Subsidiary issues relate to maximum reflectivity standa...

7. ENV-2016-AKL-000251 Auckland Council v Chen Hong Co Ltd & Mao & Lau [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...7147 Auckland Telephone: (09) 916 9091 Facsimile: (09) 916 9090 http://www.justice.govt.nz/courts/environment-court SCHEDULE OF PROCEEDINGS Application for interim enforcement orders to cease undertaking, commissioning or otherwise permitting earthworks & establishment or continuation of dwellings at 88 Fairburn Road, Otahuhu ENV-2016-304-000061 Auckland Council v Chen Hong Co Ltd, Mao & Lau Application For Interim Enforcement Order pursuant to Section 320 o...

8. Youth Court FAQs for Professionals at Alert Level 2 - August 2020 [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...Youth Court sitting during Level 2? Yes – at Alert Level 2, the Youth Court will provide an essential service. Court buildings are open; however, for physical distancing reasons, access may be restricted, including a maximum number of people permitted in the courthouse at one time. Q: Are Rangatahi and Pasifika Courts sitting during Alert Level 2? No – Rangatahi and Pasifika Courts will not continue until all participants consider it safe to do so. You should check with the Yo...

9. [2020] NZEnvC 222 Clifton Projects Limited and Sculptureum Vineyard Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 411 KB]

   ...alongside the application for orders under s 116. The court was able to accommodate that on 22 December. [3] There is an argument between the appellants and the respondent about the extent to which the appellants can avail themselves of certain permitted activities in chapter E40 of the Auckland Unitary Plan when taking up the rights embodied in the recent resource consent and an earlier one in 2015. [4] That argument can only be resolved in the context of either these substantive...

10. [2024] NZEmpC 60 Lanigan v Fonterra Brands (New Zealand) Ltd [pdf, 158 KB]

    ...collective agreement operative between 1 March 2023 and 28 February 2024. The union’s interest in this proceeding arises because the litigation will involve interpreting and/or applying the collective agreement and, in particular, whether or not it permits the method of time recording the defendant intends to operate. [5] Given the role the collective agreement will play in this proceeding, allowing the union to participate as a party falls squarely within s 221. Outcome [6]...