Search Results

1. [2020] NZIACDT 24 - BV v Aiolupotea (12 June 2020) [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...will be determined in a separate decision issued at the same time as this decision. BACKGROUND [5] Mr Aiolupotea was at the material time a licensed immigration adviser. He was a director of Breakthrough Consultancy Limited, of Auckland. His licence expired on 26 January 2019. [6] The complainant, a national of Samoa, travelled to New Zealand with his brother in November 2017. [7] Mr Aiolupotea’s file summary (a log of file activities) records that he met the complainant a...

2. Complaints Assessment Committee 403 v Shalendra Goundar [2017] NZREADT 76 [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...may impose under s 93 of the Act (these include censuring or reprimanding the licensee, and ordering the licensee to undergo training or education); [b] Impose a fine of up to $15,000; [c] Order cancellation or suspension of the licensee’s licence; and [d] Order that the licensee not perform any supervisory functions until authorised to do so. [17] In determining the appropriate penalty for misconduct, the nature of the misconduct will be considered along with other factors....

3. ORC - EIC - Dolina Lee - 15 October 2021 [pdf, 902 KB]

   ...dairy cattle, and stock exclusion be managed by the Stock Exclusion Regulations. 17 Part F introduced a new rule which provides for the construction of sediment traps in ephemeral or intermittently flowing rivers, subject to conditions, as a permitted activity. Some minor amendments are proposed to this rule. 18 My evidence outlines the submissions to Parts D, E and F and sets out the reasons for the amendments agreed at mediation. I have also undertaken an evaluation under se...

4. Scope of inquiry Minute October 2021 [pdf, 314 KB]

   ...activities before the terrorist attack, including— (i) relevant information from his time in Australia; and (ii) his arrival and residence in New Zealand; and (iii) his travel within New Zealand, and internationally; and (iv) how he obtained a gun licence, weapons, and ammunition; and (v) his use of social media and other online media; and (vi) his connections with others, whether in New Zealand or internationally; and (b) what relevant State sector agencies knew about this in...

5. CAC301 v Murphy [2015] NZREADT 42 [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...a 10 private viewing and not to an open home to the public. He did not seem to accept that, prior to that final report, the house could be regarded as contaminated. [51] It was firmly put to him by Ms Earl that he should have stopped permitting people to enter the property as at the time of the third open home, but he responded that nothing was then proven and that it was common enough for people to raise such issues in an endeavour to reduce the price of a property. [52]...

6. Geldenhuys v C Yap [2013] NZIACDT 27 (12 April 2013) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...by a company named Oceania Development Group (EMEAR) Ltd (Oceania). It appears Ms Yap is employed by the company. [13] Ms Geldenhuys is a South African national who wished to lodge an expression of interest so she could then apply for a residence permit. She approached Oceania to assist her. Three or more licensed immigration advisers were engaged with her affairs. They were Ms Yap, Ms Jessy Mathenge and Ms Megan Groves. [14] On 14 January 2011, Ms Geldenhuys prepared a form supplie...

7. LCRO 163/2020 DM v TN and EX (9 April 2021) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...got word back yet”. Six months later, again after Mr DM had telephoned Mr EX, Mr EX gave the same response and said that he would contact Mr DM as soon as he heard anything. (f) Five months later Mr DM spoke to Mr EX about losing his firearms licence. Mr EX said he could assist, but two weeks later Mr DM instructed another lawyer in [City 1] on that matter, and informed Mr EX. (g) Three months later Mr DM telephoned Mr EX about the personal grievance asking for an update. Mr...

8. TX v BT [2023] NZDT 401 (7 July 2023). [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...no application for a consent was made. b. The respondent started building work although no consent had been obtained which is in contravention of the Building Act 2004. c. Neither the respondent nor the subcontractor the respondent engaged were Licenced Building Practitioners, although the respondent held himself out to be and it was more likely than not that they were required to be given the nature of the work being done. d. The respondent assured the applicant that the work would...

9. BORA Dairy Industry Restructuring Amendment Bill [pdf, 304 KB]

   ...of the Bill provides that the chief executive or a person authorised by the chief executive may enter any place (other than a dwelling-house or marae) for the purpose of monitoring and ensuring compliance with the rules for the allocation of export licences to multiple participants for designated markets. The powers of the chief executive and the authorised officers include inspecting and examining anything at that place which relates to the obligations and duties under the Act, questioni...

10. ASC - Annual Report 2016 [pdf, 1.7 MB]

    ...Contraception, Sterilisation, and Abortion Act 1977. s14(1) (a) Keep under review all the provisions of the abortion law, and the operation and effect of those provisions in practice. (b) Receive, consider, grant, and refuse applications for licences or for the renewal of licences under this Act, and to revoke any such licence (c) Prescribe standards in respect of facilities to be provided in licensed institutions for the performance of abortions (d) Take all reasonable and...