Search Results

1. ENVC Hearing 27Jul15 AC suppl evidence Sam Shumane [pdf, 135 KB]

   ...are minimal. CONDITIONS OF CONSENT 18. I have examined the recommended conditions relating to traffic and parking agreed by WML and Auckland Transport, as attached to the Joint Memo. The conditions are now located in the draft coastal permit. I agree with the conditions agreed by WML and Auckland Transport, subject to the changes and comments recorded below: (a) Condition 8.4A: I agree with items (a) to (c) agreed by WML and Auckland Transport, but suggest a full ban...

2. [2017] NZEnvC 131 Lau v Auckland Council [pdf, 3 MB]

   ...The evidence [5] Mr Northover has confirmed to us in evidence that it is now considered, under the Building Act, a sleeping household or, in RMA terms, a single dwelling, and accordingly complies with the original building consent issued and the permitted activity status for a single dwelling in Precinct A areas. 3 [6] It was identified at the earlier hearing that the main dwelling itself had a line going through it, showing it was partly in Precinct A and Precinct G, however th...

3. Saul v Ramos [2014] NZIACDT 48 (09 April 2014) [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...work and residence visas. [2] Immigration New Zealand issued the student visa. The visa sticker in the complainant’s passport allowed a date of arrival in New Zealand that was significantly later than the date contemplated as the extent of the permitted stay in New Zealand. [3] The complainant had some difficulties and the adviser sought a new visa just before his first visa expired. When it expired, she made further applications, under a provision allowing persons with an expired vi...

4. [2009] NZEmpC CC 15/09 The Travel Practice Ltd v Owles [pdf, 27 KB]

   ...work because other staff were away. I do not find that convincing. [19] Overall, the effect of the plaintiff’s conduct is that neither the defendant nor the Authority have been informed at all of the plaintiff’s case. If the plaintiff is permitted to have a de novo hearing of its challenge, therefore, all of the evidence relied on by the plaintiff will be new to the defendant and to the Court. This would effectively frustrate an important principle of the Employment Relations...

5. [2023] NZEmpC 136 Wiles v The Vice-Chancellor of the University of Auckland [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...paper copy of the summary to Ms Stewart. (e) Ms Stewart would retain possession of the summary until she returns it to the University (through the University’s solicitors), and would not make any copy of the summary or its contents, or permit a copy of the summary or its contents to be made. (f) Associate Professor Wiles would be permitted to read the summary under the personal supervision of Ms Stewart but would not be permitted to make any copy of the summary or its co...

6. Horticulture New Zealand.pdf [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...Consideration for lags needs to be factored into Objective 2. Neutral HortNZ agree that discussion is required on any changes to the plan change in order to implement the 20% reduction Policy 1 Amend Policy 1(c) to read: Enabling, through permitted activity rules, low intensity farming and horticultural activities (not including commercial vegetable production), with low risk (individually and cumulatively) of diffuse discharge of all four contaminants to water bodies, and requiri...

7. [2017] NZEnvC 110 Auckland-Council v L Mao [pdf, 3.2 MB]

   ...legitimate interest in the works required on the property, unless it is to tenant them. [16] There is nothing in the application to suggest how change or cancellation of the Court Orders will affect either the 3rd or 4th Respondent. If it is to permit tenancies, that is clearly contrary to Orders of the Court, which are not not subject to any application. It would also be a clear breach of the relevant Plan as found by the Court. Non-compliance with the order [17] It is clear that...

8. [2015] NZSAAA 02, (30 January 2015) [pdf, 37 KB]

   ...that the required information was not received by StudyLink until early December 2007 – over a year after the date by which the Regulations required it to be submitted. [15] StudyLink certainly has a discretion under reg 4 to extend the time permitted for the submission of evidence of parental income beyond the end of the relevant academic period. No doubt some sort of argument could be advanced that in this case it should have done so. The appellant’s argument at the review hear...

9. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 AT rebuttal Anthony Blom [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...that future changes in ferry and bus services will not be compromised. 18 Ms Gisby’s evidence discusses congestion at the Matiatia keyhole area, and comments that “I am aware that there is some suggestion of having a controlled system which permits only authorised berth-holders to pass through the keyhole”. 15 19 Since preparing my evidence in chief, AT has investigated the possibility of commissioning automated access systems at a number of locations in Auckland, incl...

10. [2012] NZCA 285 CA247/2012 New Zealand Cards Ltd v Ramsay [pdf, 96 KB]

    ...decision can be made. We adjourn this application for further submissions and will make a decision on the papers. Representation [21] It is a matter of concern to us that the applicant company is not legally represented. A company is not generally permitted representation by a non-lawyer but the Court has a discretion to do so in appropriate cases. It is a discretion to be exercised sparingly. 7 We are not willing to permit Mr Beresford, or any other lay person, to present th...