Search Results

1. Holmes v Ministry of Social Development [2012] NZHRRT 19 [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...payment. That is, if the advance is made on a refundable as opposed to a non-refundable basis. [11] In Mr Holmes’ case, on or about 13 October 2009, he approached WINZ seeking assistance to pay for an eye test needed for the renewal of his driver’s licence. His application was supported by a quotation from an optometrist showing a consultation fee of $70. The Ministry approved a recoverable advance of benefit of $70 to be repaid at the rate of $3 per week. Mr Holmes was unsuccess...

2. National-Panui-September-2021 [pdf, 376 KB]

   ...Reduce the trustees by removing Cynthia Piata Tahere (deceased) as a trustee 67 A20210008012 150A(3) (b)/93 Utiku Keepa Potaka Section 60, Section 66 & Part Section 61 Block IX Onga Survey District & Part Taraketi 2A2 Block - Noting of licence to occupy 70 A20210008103 81/67 78A(7)/67 Mark Stanley Connors Tohe Nepia Te Awe Awe also known as Te Aweawe Tohe Nepia - Transfer from administrator to benefi ciaries and vest interests held absolutely in persons entitled 72 A20210...

3. Qualitative components of the outcomes evaluation of the Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Court Pilot [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   ...outcomes of the AODT Court Pilot 26 Many participants experienced housing insecurity or homelessness before entering the AODT Court. Housing insecurity severely impacted their health and wellbeing. Many participants did not have a full driving licence or their licence was suspended due to their AOD consumption or criminal activity. Some participants were unemployed when they entered the AODT Court. Some had limited or no work experience. Some had limited education experience, inclu...

4. [2018] NZEnvC 178 The Friends of Sherwood Trust & Ngati Paoa Trust Board v The Chief Executive of the Auckland Council [pdf, 2.6 MB]

   ...members of the public who wished to support their application, however given the nature of the hearing, and the need to effectively "draw a line in the sand" in relation to the evidential material presented to the Court, this was not permitted. There is a fairness issue associated with the filing of evidence in a proceeding such as this, where there is no opportunity for the other parties to properly respond to it. The approach taken was for all parties to be required to rel...

5. [2018] NZEnvC 133 Director General of Conservation v Thames Coromandel District Council [pdf, 17 MB]

   ...Federated Farmers NZ and the Sielings, versus regulation in the plan. [3] The proceedings were initiated by a DOC submission that sought for each of the Rural, Conservation and Rural Lifestyle Zones the inclusion of:1 (a) an additional earthworks permitted activity standard "where earthmoving plant and machinery does not contain soil and plant material from other locations"; and Refer Submission 827 summary table handed up by Ms Riley. 3 (b) an additional earthwork...

6. Name suppression processes for victims of sexual violence [pdf, 493 KB]

   ...the administration of justice goes beyond protecting the fundamental rights of those charged with a criminal offence. Openness also helps meet the need to preserve public confidence in the legal system. … [120] There are statutory provisions permitting exceptions to openness which allow, and at times require, the courts to suppress reports of certain evidence and to prohibit identification of offenders and witnesses in certain circumstances. These exceptions are, however, all admin...

7. [2023] NZEnvC 005 Marsden City Limited Partnership v Whangarei District Council [pdf, 2.5 MB]

   ...Marsden/ Ruakaka Wastewater System, including any adverse effects relating to potential over-allocation of capacity. 3. Anticipated land uses (including future land uses) and their potential wastewater generation. The proposal, and any future permitted activities on the proposal site(s), and their potential wastewater generation. Note: Any application shall comply with information requirement MCP-REQX. Activity Status when compliance not achieved: Restricted Discreti...

8. 2020-04-09-Plan-Changes-1-8-s-32-Evaluation-Report.pdf [pdf, 737 KB]

   ...April 2020 to 1 April 2026 to provide time for the longer-term planning processes to occur. Council made a final decision on PC6AA on 8 February 2020 and no appeals have yet been received. An additional plan change, Proposed Plan Change 7 (Water Permits) to the Water Plan (PC7) was prepared by ORC to manage applications for replacement water permits and deemed permits until a fit for purpose planning framework is developed through the new LWRP. PC7 was notified on 18 March 2020 and work...

9. ENVC Matiatia party correspondence - WML Feb15 - affidavit M Dunn [pdf, 17 MB]

   ...Area Rules 19. Part 10a.18 - Land Unit Matiatia has a comprehensive set of rules that apply to land use activities in the Mixed Use, Transport and other Wetland areas. Foremost amongst them is Rule 18.5.2 - Mixed Use Area, that lists a number of permitted, restricted discretionary, and discretionary activities. 20. "Car parking required by rule 70, 78.6.9 below" is listed as a permitted activity. Rule 10.18.6.9 lists eight particular activities, such as "movie the...

10. ENVC Matiatia party corresp WMLFeb15 affidavit M Dunn [pdf, 17 MB]

    ...Area Rules 19. Part 10a.18 - Land Unit Matiatia has a comprehensive set of rules that apply to land use activities in the Mixed Use, Transport and other Wetland areas. Foremost amongst them is Rule 18.5.2 - Mixed Use Area, that lists a number of permitted, restricted discretionary, and discretionary activities. 20. "Car parking required by rule 70, 78.6.9 below" is listed as a permitted activity. Rule 10.18.6.9 lists eight particular activities, such as "movie the...