Search Results

1. [2018] NZEnvC 045 Gravatt Family Trust v Pierau [pdf, 285 KB]

   ...down until the end of March 2017. In the meantime, Gravatt Family Trust v Pierau 2 Mr Pierau proposed to hold a "Shipwrecked Festivaf' on his property over Waitangi weekend in early February 2017, which was ultimately found to be a permitted temporary activity if conducted within certain limits. [2] The Appellants, Gravatt Family Trust ('The Trust'), applied to the Court on 5 January 2017 for an interim enforcement order and a permanent enforcement order to...

2. [2017] NZEmpC 140 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [pdf, 143 KB]

   ...The three applications relating to such issues are: a) the defendant’s application that paragraphs 5 to 12 and exhibits “A” to “F” in an affidavit of Andrew Norman Sellar sworn on 12 September 2017 not be read and that no person be permitted to inspect that affidavit on the court file; b) the plaintiff’s application seeking an order for the attendance of Neil Richard Bryant at the hearing for the purposes of his being cross- examined on his affidavit sworn on 23 Augus...

3. BORA Evidence Amendment Bill [pdf, 304 KB]

   ...Council 21. Clause 34 of the Bill amends s 119 of the Act to insert several new offences proscribing the possession, copying, supplying or showing of the video record of the evidence of vulnerable witnesses or sensitive evidence other than in a manner permitted by the Act. Unauthorised possession is punishable by fines of up to $2,000 (for an individual) or $10,000 (for a body corporate). Unauthorised copying, supplying or showing a video record is punishable by up to six months impris...

4. [2018] NZEnvC 123 Tararua District-Council v Capital All Signs Holdings Limited [pdf, 260 KB]

   ...the Council's CEO (Mr B King) wrote to the Respondents about a number of aspects of the work being undertaken on the Property. The letter recorded among other things that use of the Property for the storage of shipping containers was not a permitted activity under the Tararua District Plan (the District Plan). A series of interactions between Mr Easton and Council officers and the Mayor followed but as far as the Council was concerned compliance issues at the Property remained...

5. EI v TB [2020] NZDT 401 (19 March 2020) [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...a median strip for the purposes outlined in Rule 2.7(b), it is not permissible to drive through an intersection from one median strip onto another. [11] I find that the manoeuvre being undertaken by TB at the time the collision occurred was not permitted by Rule 2.7(b) of the RUR as TB had no intention of turning right into another CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 road or vehicle entrance and had not turned right onto the median strip. Furthermore, by his own admiss...

6. IPT Practice Note 5 Publication of decisions [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...particulars likely to lead to the identification of the appellant or affected person - (clause 19(2), Schedule 2). This does not apply to publication to persons involved in the appeal, or to persons involved in the administration of this Act, or where permitted under section 151 - (clause 19(3), Schedule 2). b) The Tribunal may, in any other case, edit the decision to remove the name of the appellant or any other person, and any particulars likely to lead to the identification of...

7. 2022-03-18 Director-General of Conservation - Opening Submissions [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...earthworks, addressed in Part G of PC8. As notified by the Otago Regional Council (Regional Council, ORC), Part G would insert new Policy 7.D.10, new Rules at 14.5 dealing with Earthworks for residential development, with Rule 14.5.1.1 providing for permitted activities providing listed standards are met, and Rule 14.5.2.1 providing for restricted discretionary activities where resource consent is required, lastly Part G also inserts an “earthworks” definition.2 4. The Directo...

8. Keegan v CAC 10062 & Peacocke & Stanaway Real Estate [2012] NZREADT 35 [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...proceedings under the Real Estate Agents Act are fundamentally different from civil proceedings. Finally he submitted that continuation of the appeal was not an abuse of process. [4] Mr Johnson also relied upon s 110. He argued further that s 105 which permits the Tribunal to regulate its own procedures does not permit the Tribunal to stay proceedings. He argues that s 102 provides that the Tribunal must hear an appeal 3 under s 111 and the Tribunal is given no statutory d...

9. [2011] NZEmpC 141 Silver Service Skips Ltd v Little [pdf, 70 KB]

   ...substantial and, in most cases, fatal to the application. Where the application is for an extension of time to a file statement of defence, the importance of this factor is very much less. This is because the interests of justice are different. Permitting a party to participate in the resolution of a dispute which is already properly before the Court is fundamentally different to permitting a party to renew a dispute before the Court which the other party is entitled to believe h...

10. Notes from Crown Maori Relations hui Gisborne 21 April 2018 [pdf, 433 KB]

    ...better support to continue doing their successful work as they are responsive to community needs and provide services within a Māori framework. • Minerals – a couple of participants congratulated the Government on restricting oil and gas permits but noted iwi are keen to work with the Government on the management of existing permits and there is still more to be done to reduce environmental impact in the region. • Environment – Some speakers identified that experiences wi...