Search Results

1. Chief Justice media statement 10 October 2021 [pdf, 501 KB]

   ...STARTING 11 OCTOBER While all or part of the Northland and Waikato regions are at Alert Level 3, no new jury trials will commence in that region. If Northland or Waikato moves to Alert Level 2 during the week of 11 October, jury trials would be permitted under the Courts’ Alert Level 2 protocols. However, judges will decide on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the individual circumstances of the case, https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/publications/announcements/covid-19/cour...

2. [2012] NZEmpC 26 Premier Events Group Ltd v Beattie [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...from the commencement of the liquidation of a company,— (a) the liquidator has custody and control of the company's assets: (b) the directors remain in office but cease to have powers, functions, or duties other than those required or permitted to be exercised by this Part: (c) unless the liquidator agrees or the Court orders otherwise, a person must not— (i) Commence or continue legal proceedings against the company or in relation to its property; or (ii) Exercis...

3. [2024] NZEnvC 012 Kumeu Industrial Park Association Incorporated v Auckland Council [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 012 an appeal against an abatement notice regarding cessation of discharging wastewater to land under expired resource consent permit at 49 Forestry Road, Riverhead, Auckland KUMEU INDUSTRIAL PARK ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED (ENV-2024-AKL-009) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Judge J A Smith Last case event: 1 February 2024 Appearances: J B...

4. [2016] NZEmpC 76 Harlow v Western Property Management Ltd [pdf, 79 KB]

   ...against the second respondent (Mr Teague) and the third respondent (West Management Limited). I indicated previously that I considered the existing causes weak and in fact issued the freezing order primarily on the basis that the High Court Rules permit orders against non-parties. The basis for that is now effectively removed and the Court would come close to exceeding its jurisdiction if the freezing order remains only against Mr Teague or the third respondent. [6] Mr...

5. [2022] NZEnvC 041 Central Otago District Council v Hosham [pdf, 256 KB]

   ...interim order without requiring prior service or holding a hearing (s320(2)). 8 [17] The interim order is made as directed in orders A – F. Finally, Mr Horsham is reminded that it is an offence under s338(1)(b), RMA to contravene, or permit contravention of, an enforcement order. ______________________________ J J M Hassan Environment Judge

6. [2013] NZEmpC 112 Nelson v Katavich [pdf, 61 KB]

   ...the following sequence of events: (a) On 26 February 2013, Ms Nelson obtained a certificate of determination from the Authority and lodged it with the District Court. That was done pursuant to s 141 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 which permits orders of the Authority to be enforced as if they were judgments of the District Court. (b) On 28 February 2013, an order was made by the District Court for the examination of Mr Katavich as to the means of Haldeman. A summons wa...

7. [2009] NZEmpC WC 22/09 Willis v Fonterra Cooperative Group Limited [pdf, 20 KB]

   ...defendant’s on 17 September 2009. The determination [7] In the Authority, Mr Willis claimed that he was unjustifiably dismissed by Fonterra for both procedural and substantive reasons. The dismissal centred on Mr Willis’s breach of Fonterra’s “permit to work policy and procedures” and serious misconduct. The Authority found that a fair process was followed and that it was open to Fonterra to dismiss Mr Willis. Good faith report [8] In its report to the Cou...

8. Hammond v Credit Union Baywide (In court media application to obtain photograph of exhibit) [2014] NZHRRT 56 [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...difficulty and stress of its own. [7.2] The Tribunal must be vigilant to ensure that those who believe their human rights – which includes the right to privacy set out in the Privacy Act – have been violated are not discouraged from doing so by permitting unrestricted access to the evidence without proper regard for the need to balance the public right of access against the interests of the individual. [7.3] The public right to know about proceedings before the Tribunal is satisfied...

9. Moala v Tangilanu [2014] NZIACDT 56 (29 April 2014) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...complaint has identified grounds and evidence in support. Clause 1.1(a) and (b) – the obligation to perform services and carryout instructions with: due care, diligence, respect and professionalism [11] The complainant was in New Zealand without a permit, Immigration New Zealand would potentially move to deport her. It was important to act promptly and ensure Immigration New Zealand received the complainant’s request for a visa. [12] It is elementary that the client of a professi...

10. OIA-105436.pdf [pdf, 336 KB]

    ...Table 1 - Number of people convicted of homosexual offences by decade Offence description 1920s 1930s 1940s 1950s Does Indecent Act Male With Male Over 16 0 0 0 1 Keeps Place Of Resort For Homosexual Acts 0 0 0 0 Other Sodomy Offences 0 2 2 9 Permits Indecent Act Male With Male Over 16 0 0 0 0 Sodomy With Male Over 16 {where the offender 0 0 0 0 was aged over 21) Sodomy With Male Over 16 {where the offender 0 0 0 0 was aged under 21) Sodomy, Indecent Assault or Indecent Acts...