Search Results

1. [2019] NZEnvC 038 Hawke's Bay Fish & Game Council v Hawke's Bay Regional Council [pdf, 277 KB]

   ...appeal to the electronic address that MTB stated in that submission. [50] The ECTA provides for when "a document, including its associated process, in electronic form that is made by, or for use in, a court or tribunal" (termed a 'permitted document') is taken to be dispatched and received. Under s29, a permitted document is taken to be dispatched at the time it first enters an information system outside the control of the originator. Under s30, it is taken to be r...

2. Wellington Standards Committee v Tawhara [2012] NZLCDT 34 [pdf, 71 KB]

   ...resigning after the allegations surfaced, and she had done that, so 5 she was no longer working for the legal practitioners who had employed her. Public protection and confidence in the profession require that a person with her record not be permitted to work in a practice or incorporated firm, so we made an order to that effect at the conclusion of the hearing. [16] The Tribunal ordered that pursuant to s 242(1)(h)(ii) Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 NICOLA TAWHARA is no...

3. Ravensdown Limited - 93 [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...7) and Consequential Amendments to Schedule D1 5.1 The decisions version of PC1 introduced ‘minimum farming standards’ that were not proposed in the notified version of PC1. Compliance with the Schedule C standards are a condition of the permitted activity rules1. In addition, compliance with some of the minimum farming standards are also a condition of the controlled, restricted discretionary and discretionary activity rules that apply to farming activities2 (but not commer...

4. 2021-10-01 Notice of Mediation - PC8 Urban [pdf, 70 KB]

   ...EC4240_NoticeOfSessionListOfParties Plan Change 8 (Urban) Mediation Schedule Topic Provisions Mediation session date Parties Sediment from earthworks for residential development (Part G) New Policy 7.D.10 New Rule 14.5.1 (land use and discharge – permitted) New Rule 14.5.2 (land use and discharge – restricted discretionary) New definition – earthworks Monday 1 November 2021 (am/pm) Director General of Conservation Dunedin City Council Federated Farmers N...

5. Barfoot & Thompson v CAC 20003 [2014] NZREADT 48 [pdf, 51 KB]

   ...not run counter to ss.134 to 137. [46] We think it to be self-evident that once an agent, in a real estate firm which holds a listing of a particular property, wishes to treat with the vendor then a concerning conflict of interest arises. To permit such a conflict of interest to continue would breach the rules. The statutory provisions of the Act permit a transaction between such an agent and vendor, but only subject to observance of the statutory requirements and of the rules to ac...

6. [2022] NZEnvC 081 The New Zealand King Salmon Company Limited [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...health and safety of those attending that visit. The court acknowledges that this does not restrict the media from accessing the publicly accessible parts of the Department of Conservation reserve area but directs that anyone doing so is not permitted to take audio recording and must maintain a 30 metre separation distance from the court and those 4 assisting to guide the court. ______________________________ J J M Hassan Environment Judge 5 Schedule –...

7. M Ltd v J Ltd [2022] NZDT 272 (20 December 2022) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...property since 2016 and was not involved in the design or construction of the building. The retaining wall was built in the 1970’s and was consented by [City] Council. The presence of the retaining wall was a natural and ordinary use of the land as permitted under the zoning law of [City]. J Ltd did not drill the three little holes in the retaining wall and has not artificially altered the course of any ground water, therefore has not created a nuisance. 8. I have carefully considere...

8. [2013] NZEmpC 103 Language Centres v Page [pdf, 64 KB]

   ...which include the administration fees and an element of duplication. I therefore award the successful defendant as a contribution towards his costs, the sum of $45,000. [16] I note that there is no express statutory provision which would permit this to be included in the instalment arrangements I have put in place for the repayment of the remedies. B S Travis Judge Judgment signed at 2.30 pm on 5 June 2013

9. 20241107-Treaty-Principles-Bill.pdf [pdf, 291 KB]

   ...principles of the Treaty of Waitangi. 1 F.Adcock Māori and the Bill of Rights Act: A case of missed Opportunity (2013) 11 NZJIPL at 200 2 Fitzgerald v R [2021] NZSC 131; [2021] 1 NZLR 551 at [46] – [49] 4 8213543.5 15. Again, time does not permit a comprehensive account of the existing treaty principles, but the impact is illustrated by just one – the principle of active protection recognised in the Lands case3, by which the Crown must take such steps as are reasonable in t...

10. EQ & KQ v D Ltd [2024] NZDT 431 (30 May 2024) [pdf, 176 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 431 APPLICANT EQ APPLICANT KQ RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: EQ and KQ are ordered to pay D Ltd the sum of $221.38. Payment of this sum is ordered no later than 14 June 2024. Reasons: 1) The applicants contacted the respondent to fix a leaking tap and a leak in a shower. They say they informed the res