Search Results

1. King - Rangitikei Manawatu Part B4 Lot 1 DP 4102 (Old Post Office) (2024) 480 Aotea MB 242 (2024 AOT 242) [pdf, 294 KB]

   ...that this omission is a typographical error. 480 Aotea MB 246 That all direct descendants of Manawaroa present at today’s meeting agree and approve that all and any whāngai present and any direct descendants of any whāngai present be permitted to vote at this year’s election. [13] The motion was seconded by Nuwyne Te Awe Awe Mohi and was carried with 32 in favour and three against. Those opposing the trustee appointments say that this motion was not proper as it is co...

2. [2019] NZEnvC 050 Palmerston North Airport Limited v Palmerston North City Council [pdf, 4 MB]

   ...dust ond odour can be an issue in the Industrial Zone. These effects can be caused by discharges from Industries In the Zone or by wind-blown dirt from unsealed yards. Every discharge to air from an industriol or trade premise requires a discharge permit from the Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council unless the discharge is expressly provided for by Rule 14-12 of the One Plan. Compliance with the conditions of rules of this District Plan does not exempt any person from compliance with requirem...

3. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Ms A [2022] NZLCDT 51 (22 December 2022) [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...pass an exam to obtain the necessary qualification to be a trust account supervisor. The course assessment procedures are set out in the workbook. They say that the TAS exam is a closed book examination with only relevant legislation and rules permitted in the exam. They also say that apart from the permitted materials, candidates may not refer to any other written material during the exam. [8] Candidates are invited to bring the workbook and the manual to the exam room to as...

4. EN v ML [2022] NZDT 257 (19 December 2022) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...bookshelf) and whether they were gifted or loaned. EN and his wife are/were ML’s parents-in-laws, ML having separated from their son QN. EN says the items were lent to QN and ML in 2020 while they were overseas and since the split QN has not been permitted to the property to retrieve them. ML says they were a gift and retained by her as part of the division of relationship property. There are 2 issues to decide. First, were the items a gift or a loan? and if a loan and if they are not r...

5. 2021-02-19 ORC - notice - cross-examination & leave to extend XXN (19 Feb 2021) [pdf, 119 KB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI ROHE ENV-2020-CHC-127 UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) IN THE MATTER of the Water Permits Plan Change - Plan Change 7, being part of a proposal of national significance directed by the Minister for the Environment to be referred to the Environment Court under section 142(2)(b) of the RMA AND IN THE MATTER of an application under section 149T of the RMA BET...

6. [2020] NZEmpC 29 Maharaja India Ltd v A Labour Inspector [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...I acknowledge the importance of the principle of freedom of access to the courts, that principle must give way to the statutory requirements which override that right where the party purporting to bring the challenge has no status to do so. To permit a challenge to proceed which is contrary to law would produce unfairness and undermine confidence in the administration of justice.11 Conclusion [15] Accordingly, the statement of claim dated 26 August 2019 is struck out....

7. [2012] NZEmpC 141 Transpacific v Harris and Green [pdf, 58 KB]

   ...in person Judgment: 20 August 2012 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE G L COLGAN [1] The issue for decision today is whether the defendants and, in the case of Mr Harris and Smart Environmental Limited, their counsel, should be permitted to see or otherwise know of the contents of exhibits attached to the affidavit of the plaintiff’s Dean Matthew Brown sworn on 15 August 2012. [2] On 12 and 13 September 2012, a full Court is to determine the validity in law of a...

8. XP v O Ltd [2023] NZDT 729 (12 December 2023) [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...failure to attend at the first hearing, the tribunal noted in its adjournment order: “I have indicated to O Ltd’s company that should they be unprepared for the next hearing the matter may proceed in their absence.” 6) Accordingly, as is permitted, the tribunal continued with the hearing today, hearing only from XP. Background 7) XP applied for an order that O Ltd reimburse her the sum of $750.00 that she paid for blinds supplied and installed by O Ltd in a room XP in...

9. [2022] NZEnvC 108 Nelson City Council [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...mean high water springs at Delaware Bay in Nelson for driving vehicles across to launch and retrieve recreational boats/fishing vessels at the water’s edge. [2] The application will be seeking a declaration that the activity above is not a permitted activity under Rule CMr.33 of the Nelson Resource Management Plan, and therefore, requires resource consent. Service of the application [3] Section 312(1), RMA1 requires an application for declaration to be served on every person...

10. [2014] NZEmpC 207 Canon New Zealand Ltd v Hutchison [pdf, 71 KB]

    ...Minute of 22 September, and about 18 days after the extended period allowed by the Court for the defendant to do so. [11] Against this unusual background in which the plaintiff has not been entirely without fault, I consider that it is just to permit the defendant to cross-challenge out of time. That is for the following reasons. [12] The broad question that the Authority had to determine was whether there had been compliance with the requirements for a trial period under ss 67A...