Search Results

1. CEIT Practice Notes 2022 [pdf, 460 KB]

   ...statements filed; • each witness will be asked a few clarifying questions by the party calling them (or that party’s advocate if they have one) before answering questions from the Tribunal; • the other party (or their advocate if they have one) will be permitted to ask questions; and • the party/advocate who has called a witness will then be able to ask questions that clarify anything arising out of the questions asked by the Tribunal or the other party/advocate. The Tribunal has pow...

2. MC v BL [2013] NZIACDT 8 (28 February 2013) [pdf, 134 KB]

   ...DECISION REPRESENTATION: Complainant: In person. Adviser: In person. Date Issued: 28 February 2013 2 DECISION Introduction [1] Mr MC engaged Ms BL to assist him to apply for a work permit. He claims Ms BL failed in her responsibilities in a number of respects. [2] He says Ms BL: [2.1] Delayed lodging his application, then said it had been lodged, when that was not true. [2.2] Lodged an application that could not succeed...

3. [2010] NZEmpC 10 Snowdon v Radio New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 147 KB]

   ...submitted that, to use the words of Chief Justice Roberts in a different context: “enough is enough”. 13 [41] Mr Quigg submitted that the current fraud proceedings require the plaintiff to put forward her evidence in support and not to be permitted to fish for further evidence to support those allegations. He submitted that neither this proceeding nor the substantive proceedings should be delayed any further. The plaintiff’s supplementary submissions [42] Mr Moodie com...

4. [2018] NZEnvC 116 Kumeu Property Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 8 MB]

   ...waive the requirement to provide bicycle parks to be provided pursuant to Rule E27.6.2.5 restricted discretionary activity. Taking, using, damming and diversion of water and drilling (bore water consent) (s14)­ REG- REG-68002 and 68003 1. Bore Permit - for any new bores for purposes not otherwise specified pursuant to Rule E7.4.1 (A41) - restricted discretionary activity. 2. Water Take - 70m3 per day and 23,320m3 per year of groundwater take from the Kumeu East Waitemata Sandstone...

5. LG v Hakaoro [2013] NZIACDT 23 (03 April 2013) [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...Hakaoro should have made inquiries into the complainant’s circumstances and immigration history, first with the complainant, and then with Immigration New Zealand. It would have been evident that the complainant was in no position to seek a work permit. Unless she could get a work permit, she could not expect to get an offer of employment; and having one would not assist with an application under section 61. [52] Where a person has had some irregularity with a work permit, the Tribun...

6. Regulatory Impact Statement Human Rights Amendment Bill [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...possible without amending the Act again. The Ministry considers, therefore, that this option would insufficiently address the concerns raised with respect to the current governance arrangements. 37. The current arrangements in the Act also do not permit appointment of a specialised Commissioner in more than one specialised role. Option 3: Appointment of a Chief Commissioner and Human Rights Commissioners, who will lead the work associated with priority areas of human rights 38. This...

7. [2023] NZEnvC 185 Regina Properties Limited v New Plymouth District Council [pdf, 392 KB]

   ...have not been confirmed but neutral colours are indicated I was advised that proposal proposes a maximum building height of 15.4 metres above existing ground level within Lot 1 DP 19148 and therefore a maximum infringement of 5.4 metres above the permitted 10 metre height limit for the zone. However, and as the site is not uniform, differing height infringements occur at various parts of the site. The existing consented GQ building is approximately 1.7 metres higher than the 10-metre he...

8. Air New Zealand Ltd v Lavender (Work Related Gradual Process Injury) [2024] NZACC 26 [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...[21] In Woolyarns,3 Ongley DCJ stated: [27] ... In an attempt to articulate the purpose of prescribing the boundaries of work-related cover, my view is that the extension beyond actual work activity reaches places where the employee is required or permitted to be because of the fact of or the nature of the employment … 1 Weal v Accident Compensation Corporation [2016] NZHC 2612. 2 M v Accident Compensation Corporation [2015] NZACC 286. 3 Woolyarns v Accident Compensation Corp...

9. Amended affirmation of Mr Gary Taylor 2 December 2016 [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...bed, and north ofthe Tekapo River. The area for whkh this Certificate of Compliance is sought is all of that landshovv::n on the .Plan attached (Ap.pendix A). 3.0 PROFOSEDACTIVITY Simons Pass StationLimited proposes to undertake the following permitted activity: • pastoralintensificanon (Rrue7.15.1.1) on the land shown on the plan contained as AppenrltxA. Pastoral intensHi€'auon involving subdivisional fencing and oversowing and toprlressingWilI be undertaken over the e...

10. Lohr v Accident Compensation Corporation [2016] NZHRRT 31 [pdf, 306 KB]

    ...40(1) time limit. The requested information was subsequently provided on 8 May 2014 except for two categories of information: [6.1] The entire investigation file. ACC justified the withholding of this information under s 27(1)(c) of the Act which permits an agency to refuse disclosure of information requested under Principle 6 if the disclosure of the information would be likely to prejudice the maintenance of the law, including the prevention, investigation, and detection of offences,...