Search Results

1. [2010] NZEmpc 98 Marshment v Sheppard Industries Ltd [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...Marshment applied for a very urgent hearing of his challenge and although the Court was in a position to grant this, the company’s concessions about the effect of the Authority’s injunctive order (as recorded in a minute issued on 7 July 2010) permitted the plaintiff to travel to the sales exhibition and return to New Zealand before the hearing of this challenge. [3] The Employment Relations Authority has scheduled its investigation meeting to begin on 5 and 6 August 2010 althou...

2. Reid v Accident Compensation Corporation [2023] NZACC 194 [pdf, 254 KB]

   ...Corporation’s decision of 22 May 2020. [17] On 27 August 2020, review proceedings were held. On 25 September 2020, the Reviewer dismissed the review, noting that noted that the case involved the Corporation making a decision that specifically permitted it to apply its discretion, and that, in such cases, the Reviewer’s power was limited. The Reviewer found that there was no error of law or principle, irrelevant considerations were not taken into account, relevant consideration...

3. [2024] NZEnvC 107 Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Incorporated v Waipa District Council [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...roost trees within the Northern Precinct and enhancement and protection of biodiversity compensation areas to be undertaken in accordance with an approved Ecological Management Plan. Section 10 – Airport Business Zone 10.4 Rules 1. For the permitted activities in Activity Status Table 10.4.1, delete Rules 10.4.1.1 (bb) and (dd) and amend Rule 10.4.1.1 (cc) to read: (bb) Trimming or pruning of vegetation or trees within the Northern Precinct outside a Bat Habitat Area. (ccbb) Rem...

4. Anderson v Lowe - Succession to Moera Anderson [2021] Chief Judge's MB 728 (2021 CJ 728) [pdf, 499 KB]

   ...Māori people enjoy. A whāngai that is not Māori falls outside the ambit of this legislative scheme and policy unless the tikanga (as an expression of their rangatiratanga over land) of the relevant group of owners, their whānau and their hapū permitted such whāngai to succeed. [41] In this case, I note that the applicant contended that the tikanga of her hapū of Ngāti Maniapoto prevents whāngai from succeeding to land where there is no blood connection to the owners, whāna...

5. Tukapua v Taueki - Horowhenua Block 11 (2012) 278 Aotea MB 172 (278 AOT 172) [pdf, 163 KB]

   ...His nomination was then endorsed by two existing trustees, Mr Matakātea and Dr Proctor. [31] Phillip Taueki, however, submitted that Mr Tukapua displayed ignorance of the duties of a trustee when he did not follow proper process in requiring permits of any persons who wished to undertake activities at Lake Horowhenua. It was argued that this lack of understanding underscored the unsuitability of Mr Tukapua for appointment. [32] The ―reserve‖ referred to in the original Nativ...

6. Privacy-Act-2020-Indirect-notification-obligation-April-2023-Cabinet-paper_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 2.7 MB]

   ...providers to the benefit of Māori. Withholding information and data from Māori during the COVID-19 response led to a lengthy judicial process.4 As a result of this, health data is now shared directly with Māori in support of self-determination and as permitted by the Privacy Act. 49. The risk that the notification requirement could create some disincentive to share personal information with Māori groups has been minimised by placing the notification obligation on the collecting ra...

7. 20240924-Marine-and-Coastal-Area-Takutai-Moana-Customary-Marine-Title-Amendment-Bill.pdf [pdf, 372 KB]

   ...applies. 14.2. A conservation permission right by which CMT holders can grant or withhold permission on any grounds for consideration of an application or proposal for a conservation activity. 14.3. Rights in relation to marine mammal watching permits. 14.4. A right for CMT holders to have their views considered if the Minister of Conservation is proposing to prepare, issue, change, review, or revoke a New Zealand coastal policy statement.20 14.5. A right to create a planning docume...

8. LCRO 8/2022 QQ v LW (8 October 2024) [pdf, 227 KB]

   ...the s 174/CAL proceeding only.”21 [44] “Notwithstanding r 10.2, he was self-represented on at least one of the matters (and was not apparently represented in relation to any negotiations of which there had not been any for 12 months) so I was permitted to write to him directly”22 [45] “Even so, because the letter by necessity traversed matters on which Mr LW had been involved, it was critical that Mr LW be copied – and he was;”23 [46] “… However, all of the content of...

9. Independent Electoral Review Final Report [pdf, 11 MB]

   ...Recommendations for a Fairer, Clearer, and More Accessible Electoral System. Wellington: New Zealand. ISBN 978-0-473-69963-5 (Print) ISBN 978-0-473-69964-2 (Online) This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. You are free to copy, distribute, and adapt the work, provided you attribute the work to the Independent Electroral Review, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Final Report | Contents 1 Contents Me...

10. Independent Electoral Review Final Report Accessible word doc [docx, 9.5 MB]

    ...Clearer, and More Accessible Electoral System. Wellington: New Zealand. ISBN 978-0-473-69963-5 (Print) ISBN 978-0-473-69964-2 (Online) [image: Creative Commons License] This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. You are free to copy, distribute, and adapt the work, provided you attribute the work to the Independent Electoral Review, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. 6 Final Report | Contents Final Re...