Search Results

1. [2016] NZEmpC 86 Radius Residential Care Ltd v The NZ Nurses Organisation Inc [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...unions told Radius that they would then be engaged in paid stop-work meetings about matters of union business and, inferentially at least, collective bargaining that was then going on. [6] Paid stop-work meetings of limited duration are permitted under both the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act) 1 and the relevant collective agreement applicable to the employees at the time. Although the employees were paid for the periods that they were absent from work, as they wo...

2. ORC PC7 Hearing Schedule - 6.4.2021 [pdf, 283 KB]

   ...Perkins Planning Evidence Summary (10min) ORC (45min) Nga Rūnanga (30min) MFE (30min) F&G (30min) OWRUG (30min) Court (45min) Lunch (12.45pm) OWRUG *Witness to be recalled Sally Dicey Planning Evidence Court TA's - CODC only *If time permits, otherwise re- schedule for Hearing Week 7 in Dunedin Nick Lanham Representation Representation (30min) TA's - CODC only *If time permits, otherwise re- schedule for Hearing Week 7 in Dunedin Benjamin Patterson Economic...

3. LCRO 196/2016 GY v SO (15 September 2017) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...requests that Ms SO be fined. [20] In support of her application she: (a) Asks whether a lawyer who has received “information from a random phone call made - general enquiry – who just so happens to be her former client’s ex-partner” is permitted to contact a former client.20 (b) Again disputes the receptionist’s version of the telephone conversation between him and Ms GY. (c) States that she would not recognise the lawyer who acted for her, Ms SO, or PM’s lawyer...

4. 2021-03-18 ORC PC7 Hearing Schedule (draft as at 17 March 2021) [pdf, 295 KB]

   ...Bridget Irving Opening Submission Opening Opening (1hr) Court (15min) OWRUG Hort NZ FS711 71131 Ian McIndoe Hydrology (Dams) Evidence Summary (10min) Court (45min) ORC (45min) F&G (30min) RF&B (30min) Lunch (12.45pm) OWRUG *If time permits Mr Hickey to be called, otherwise to be re-scheduled for later in the Hearing Matthew Hickey Hydrology / Ecology Evidence Summary (10min) Court (45min) ORC (1hr) Nga Rūnanga (30min) DOC (30min) F&G (30min) RF&B (3...

5. Jones v ACC [2014] NZACA 17 [pdf, 70 KB]

   ...determine the issue as between those who were party to the litigation. Furthermore, parties who are involved in litigation are expected to put before the court all the issues relevant to that litigation. If they do not, they will not normally be permitted to have a second bite at the cherry: Henderson v Henderson (1843) 3 Hare 100. [33] It is part of the law of New Zealand, as expressed by the Court of Appeal in R v Smith [2003] 3 NZLR 617, [46]: Unless a judgment of a Court is set a...

6. BORA Parliament Bill [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...are sufficient safeguards to ensure that these search powers are not more intrusive than reasonably necessary: a. Reasonable grounds are required to conduct more intrusive searches under clause 170. b. Regardless of the method, clause 170 only permits the officer to ask to search. The person must still consent to the search (see clause 171). If they do not consent, or they withdraw their consent after it is given, then there is no authority to search. The person may then be denied entr...

7. [2024] NZEmpC 252 Soundhomes NZ Limited v Doughty [pdf, 258 KB]

   ...the trust in the meantime, given the existence of the equitable right under the loan agreement, which I agree would not have required Mr Doughty’s co-operation. [42] If a question had come before the Court as to whether the trust should be permitted to proceed with registration of the mortgage, it is more likely than not the Court would have approved this possibility, given the pre-existing liability and associated rights held by the trust. The applicant’s rights under the free...

8. [2015] NZEmpC 57 Q v Commissioner of Police [pdf, 719 KB]

   ...no reason why this should not occur. Police had disagreed with the result that a Notice of Duty Stand Down was served on 17 May 2010, and Notices of Restricted Duties on 14 June 2010 and 12 October 2010, the effect of which were that he was not permitted to return to work with the Unit but alternative work was available elsewhere. Mr Q attended his GP throughout this period, obtaining medical certificates which confirmed he was unfit for work. On 29 October 2010, the reha...

9. Issue 25 1 October 31 December 2020 [pdf, 737 KB]

   ...The programme is in its fourth year of operation and Police advise it has been highly successful for participants. III. Oranga Tamariki (OT) advised this inquiry that it supports rangatahi/youths in care who are old enough to get their driver’s licence though its ‘Transition to Independence’ support services. In August 2019, OT partnered with the NZTA and MSD to financially support rangatahi through the graduated driver licence process. OT worked with its partners to focus on im...

10. Human Rights Act 1993

    ...right of court or tribunal to regulate its own procedure in the interests of the proper administration of justice – whether fair or unfair to deny litigant in person a particular form of assistance – circumstances in which particular agent not be permitted to represent a party – Human Rights Act 1993, ss 104(5) and 108(3) – Human Rights Review Tribunal Regulations 2002, reg 16(1) Guo v Culpan (Agent) [2017] NZHRRT 57 Apparent bias – recusal – test for Deliu v New Zealand Law Soci...

    Located in:

    1. Tribunals >
    2. Human rights >
    3. Decisions - Index