Search Results

1. [2022] NZEmpC 167 Halse v Employment Relations Authority [pdf, 331 KB]

   ...that the non-publication order 14 First determination, above n 2. 15 At [51]. may require Mr Halse to amend some of the social media posts.16 He was recorded as denying breaching the settlement agreement while admitting making or permitting the posts that gave rise to the litigation.17 [36] The second determination was dated 13 August 2018.18 The non-publication order made on 27 July 2018 was reviewed and remained in place.19 [37] The third determination was d...

2. D-G Conservation - EiC - N R Dunn - Freshwater Ecology (5 Feb 2021) [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...DOC-6558656 Evidence of Dr Nicholas Dunn on behalf of Director-General of Conservation for Otago Regional Council Plan Change 7 Map 1. Distribution of deemed mining permits (yellow) and threatened non-diadromous galaxias in Otago. 11 DOC-6558656 Evidence of Dr Nicholas Dunn on behalf of Director-General of Conservation for Otago Regional Council Plan Change 7 Threats to non-diadromous galaxiid...

3. Milne v Lodge [2010] NZWHT Wellington 3 [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...3 [1992] 1 NZLR 178 (HC), 209. 4 HC Auckland, CP303-SD01, 9 August 2001, Tompkins J. 16 with experts, preparing briefs and attendance at the trial. I am satisfied that the claim for this latter period cannot be allowed. The law does not permit recovery for time spent by a party in preparation for litigation, on the basis that such a loss is not a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the breach of contract. … [104] In her evidence relating to general damages, she referred...

4. Naera v Fenwick - Whakapoungakau 24 Block (2011) 34 Waiariki MB 151 (34 WAR 151) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...responding to litigation pursued by the Applicants and that the funding to be provided, in part at least, will be used to pay some of these expenses. [5] The Applicants submit that there may be risks to the trust and its assets if the trustees are permitted to continue with the BOT. To protect the owners the Applicants argue that the Respondents should be prevented from accessing this funding until the appeal is determined. [6] The Applicants also claim that the trustees have faile...

5. BORA Financial Markets Conduct Bill [pdf, 474 KB]

   ...and publishing offers or intended offers of financial products that are regulated offers (ie. offers requiring disclosure under Part 3 of the Bill as defined in cl 29). Advertising or publicity other than in accordance with those rules is not permitted (cl 73) and a breach of these rules makes a person liable for civil remedies. [12] Clauses 13 and 17 of Schedule 1 state that it is also not permitted to advertise offers that would be regulated offers but for the exclusions referred...

6. [2022] NZEnvC 030 Anderson Branch Creek Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 973 KB]

   ...access to and linking Ski Area Sub‐ Zones to the roading network; i. stormwater management; j. geotechnical matters. 21.4.25 Ski Area Activities not located within a Ski Area Sub-Zone, with the exception of: a. non-commercial skiing which is permitted as recreation activity under Rule 21.4.22; 13 b. commercial heli skiing not located within a Ski Area Sub-Zone is a commercial recreation activity and Rule 21.4.13 applies; c. Passenger Lift Systems to which Rule 21.4.24 applies;...

7. LCRO 10/2018 DO v ABC & Body Corporate (30 August 2019) [pdf, 274 KB]

   ...lawyer and client relationship. [58] If it stood alone, that proposition might well need to be tempered with the observation that client protection should not be paternalistic. However, that appears to be recognised by the rule itself, as it permits a direct communication if the third party is agreeable and their lawyer has reasonable advance notice of the intention to communicate. 16 13 [2016] NZHC 2288. 14 Being to maintain publi...

8. [2013] NZEmpC 206 Candyland Ltd v Jarvis [pdf, 135 KB]

   ...Jarvis accepted that Mrs Coker had told her to have her lunch break but that she got diverted by Ms Lang asking for assistance with her show. Rather than immediately taking a break, she assisted Ms Lang and then had a brief break later, as time permitted. It is evident that staff members pitched in to help others as required, consistently with the varied nature of the tasks they were employed to do and the ebb and flow of customer demands throughout the day. Mrs Jarvis said that...

9. Donnelly v Tuala Rongohaere Marae (2007) 78 Ruatoria MB 55 (78 RUA 55) [pdf, 267 KB]

   ...apposite to the instant case. I will not be drawn into mandate issues over fisheries between supporters of Te Rünanga o Ngäti Porou and Uepohatu. There are processes available to deal with such matters and neither this nor the Appellate Court will permit cases over the administration of Mäori reservations to become vehicles for mandate disputes. They are a distraction and for present purposes have no value in these proceedings other than to illustrate the behaviour of certain...

10. [2015] NZEmpC 82 Smith Crane and Construction Ltd v Hall [pdf, 226 KB]

    ...Division with Smith Crane and Construction Ltd based in Christchurch, New Zealand. Details of employment would be as follows:  A commencement date of as soon as practicable to suit your personal circumstances and on presentation of your NZ Work Permit.  Your usual hours of work would be 7.00am to 5.30pm, five days per week, Monday to Friday (50 hours per week) however you are expected to work hours required to manage the operation as described in the attached job descrip...