Search Results

1. Wellington v MacDonald - Te Maika B4 Residue (2008) 129 Whangarei MB 258 (129 WH 258) [pdf, 6.1 MB]

   ...minute records: "Henry Hnehne Wellington. Atso present: Rosie MacDonald and Joe Wellington Court: Reads letter dated 8/1198 from Joe Wellington objecting, claiming unfairness and that he should have received a share of rental received for the licence granted to B.C.L Ltd - televisions masts. The issues raised are all part of unhappiness previously discussed during the partition of the block where Joe received his own identified arc and separate title. In this case, rangatiratan...

2. [2020] NZREADT 31 – Turoa v Real Estate Agents Authority (30 July 2020) [pdf, 289 KB]

   ...given the earlier complaint by the Vendor. [90] The Authority submitted: 5.19 The Authority’s submission aligns with the Committee’s finding that while the Agency may have considered Mr Turoa a senior agent, Mr Turoa holds a salespersons licence. The Agency is required under r 8.3 and s 50 to provide proper supervision and management of Mr Turoa, as a salesperson, and this should occur on a day to day basis. The Authority submits that this supervision policy was not adeq...

3. Regulatory-Systems-Courts-Improvement-Amendment-Bill_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 514 KB]

   ...Markets Authority, New Zealand Police, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner, the Public Defence Service, and the Reserve Bank of New Zealand. 20 In addition, the Judiciary, the principal Disputes Tribunal Referee, the Private Security Personnel Licencing Authority and the following agencies and groups were consulted as appropriate on the drafting of certain amendments relevant to them: the Anti-Money Laundering Industry Advisory Group, the New Zealand Law Society, the 1 Freedom of...

4. [2023] NZEnvC 242 New Zealand Transport Agency v Auckland Council [pdf, 21 MB]

   ...14) E3 Lakes, rivers, streams and wetlands • Diversion of a stream with associated disturbance and sediment discharge outside of any overlays as a discretionary activity under rule E3.4.1 (A19). • Any activities not complying with the general permitted activity standards in E3.6.1.1 or the specific standards in E3.6.1.10 – E3.6.1.13 (outside overlays) as a discretionary activity under rule E3.4.1 (A26). • Temporary structures that comply with the standards within E3.6.1.15 within...

5. [2023] NZEnvC 203 Director-General of Conservation v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...(‘NZKS’) to establish two salmon farms known as ‘Blue Endeavour’. The decision to grant resource consent was made on behalf of Marlborough District Council by an Independent Hearing Panel acting under delegated authority. The coastal permit authorises NZKS to establish and operate two salmon farms within a 1,000ha site north of Te Uku/Cape Lambert, Northern Marlborough. [2] I have read and considered the consent memorandum of the parties dated 2 June 2023 which explains...

6. [2022] NZEnvC 025 Greater Wellington Regional Council v Adams [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   ...Greater Wellington Regional Council (the GWRC), applies for enforcement orders pursuant to ss 314(1) and 316 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) to: (a) Prohibit the fourth to tenth respondents from commencmg any activities that are not permitted by the Appeals Version of the Proposed Natural Resources Plan for the Wellington Region (the PNRP) and the National Environmental Standards for Freshwater (the NES­ Freshwater) within the wetlands delineated in the affidavit of Phil...

7. [2024] NZEnvC 292 Allied Asphalt Limited [pdf, 866 KB]

   ...of asphalt; (c) to use natural gas as fuel for the new plant except in the event of short-term supply interruption or if it is no longer financially viable; and 3 (d) a term of 35 years from the date of commencement of the air discharge permit. [2] In a decision dated 9 October 2024, the proposal was authorised subject to conditions. The Court made preliminary comments in relation to the conditions of consent and directed the Regional Council to file with the Court a revi...

8. [2013] NZEmpC 71 Gilbert v Transfield Services (New Zealand) Ltd [pdf, 362 KB]

   ...down, as was the commensurate need for Inside Plant Technicians’ involvement in it. Some of the technical positions with the NV group had been taken by temporary or casual workers, some of whom were temporary migrants to New Zealand whose work permits expired during or at about the time of the restructuring. At least one temporary employee was offered permanent employment with Transfield and given inside plant training to enable him to undertake Chorus work. Another temporary...

9. Tucker & Ors as Trustees of the Ngahere Trust v Tucker [pdf, 256 KB]

   ...an aesthetic problem not a waterproofing one, i.e. a matter going to jurisdiction. [152] In the Sixth respondent’s closing submissions, Mr Locke submits that there is no evidence to suggest that the cracking and warping of the bands has permitted water to enter the cladding or to cause damage to the building structure. [153] Mr Grindle submits that the extensive cracking that has occurred throughout the feature bands on this property is likely to be a cause of water ingr...

10. [2006] NZEmpC AC 47/06 Cliff & Groom v Air NZ Ltd [pdf, 208 KB]

    ...questions about reliability of the data as she had for Mr Cliff. Mr Groom reiterated that he had not visited pornographic sites and gave again his reasons for visiting the lingerie site. He pointed out that the policy said that some personal use was permitted. He disputed that he had spent 96 hours on the Internet. He was assured that there was no issue with his performance. [99] Ms Roberts made some submissions noting the lack of performance issues, that Mr Groom had been ope...