Search Results

1. LCRO 212/2016 LM v HR (22 September 2017) [pdf, 266 KB]

   ...District Law Society Inc. (ADLSI)/Real Estate Institute of New Zealand (REINZ) form. [6] Clause 3.10 of the Agreement provides:3 The parties shall complete settlement by way of remote settlement, provided that where payment by bank cheque is permitted under the PLS Guidelines, payment may be made by the personal delivery of a bank cheque to the vendor’s lawyer’s office, so long as it is accompanied by the undertaking from the purchaser’s lawyer required by those Guidelines....

2. LCRO 212/2016 LMN Law v HR [pdf, 252 KB]

   ...District Law Society Inc. (ADLSI)/Real Estate Institute of New Zealand (REINZ) form. [6] Clause 3.10 of the Agreement provides:3 The parties shall complete settlement by way of remote settlement, provided that where payment by bank cheque is permitted under the PLS Guidelines, payment may be made by the personal delivery of a bank cheque to the vendor’s lawyer’s office, so long as it is accompanied by the undertaking from the purchaser’s lawyer required by those Guidelines....

3. Final Env-Reg-Report-2017-18 [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...joined an existing directly referred application for consent to upgrade an existing gondola in Queenstown. E.49 7 | P a g e • Lindis Catchment Group Inc – an application for resource consents in relation to the replacement of water permits required to implement an alternative regime within the Lindis catchment. This direct referral joined an existing plan appeal that relates to a related Plan Change to Otago Regional Water Plan. Land Valuation Proceedings As record...

4. EA v WSC2 LCRO 11 / 2011 (24 June 2011) [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...raised by the Applicant in an application for review of the Committee‟s decision following completion of its investigation. Section 200 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act requires the LCRO to conduct a review with as little technicality as is permitted by the Act, a proper consideration of the review and the principles of natural justice. Nothing would be achieved by deferring a decision on this issue until the investigation is completed and a decision issued. [c] The Standa...

5. [2023] NZSSAA 7 (30 March 2023) [pdf, 260 KB]

   ...DES that was approved after the third period was outside of the scope of the Home Help Programme. [20.5] There is no basis that XXXX is entitled to further grants going forward. [20.6] The Ministry provided other forms of support that were permitted by law, and appropriate. This included support 7 from a disability allowance and “home help for domestic support”.4 The Law [21] As was said in the Indicative decision, the regulation of social security is so...

6. [2017] NZSAAA 03 (7 July 2017) [pdf, 343 KB]

   ...ambit of the discretion provided by reg 4(6) which, while providing the necessary flexibility to enable StudyLink to accommodate the impact of “external influences that temporarily prevent the person from meeting their requirements”, does not permit the wholesale ignoring of the prescribed timeframe. [11] In assessing the appellant’s arguments, both on the papers and at the hearing, the Secretary starts by emphasising that: 4 “My assessment of the Applicant is that she...

7. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Harder [2022] NZLCDT 29 (23 August 2022) [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...leave him alone with Mr S even after he was interrupted. In short, while his judgment may have been “clouded” Mr Harder certainly knew what he was doing, and that it was wrong. [66] Those who are in custody are vulnerable. They are not permitted any freedom of movement and have few options by way of complaint. Mr Harder only gained access to the cells because the custodial officers believed he was a lawyer exercising his functions as such. [67] While Mr Harder refrained...

8. Tamou v Smith - Sections 57, 58, 70, 72 and 100 of the Ratana Pa (2016) 361 Aotea MB 75 (361 AOT 75) [pdf, 297 KB]

   ...deed of trust, and must be exercised accordingly, in the interest of the beneficiaries. A power, even though not a fiduciary power, must be exercised solely in furtherance of the purpose for which it was conferred. [29] Generally the Court is permitted to appoint a new trustee or new trustees, whenever it is expedient per s 51 of the Trustee Act 1956. If it is found inexpedient, difficult, or 12 119 Whanganui MB 201, 206 (...

9. E50 Myfanwy Eaves - Historic Heritage - EIC - Council V2 [pdf, 810 KB]

   ...without prior authority from Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga. An Authority is required whether or not the land on which an archaeological site may be present is designated, a resource or building consent has been granted, or the activity is permitted under the Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part (November 2016). According to the Act (section 6) archaeological site means, subject to section 42(3) – a) any place in New Zealand, including any building or structure (or part...

10. Matchitt v Butler - Matangareka 3B Ahu Whenua Trust (2016) 154 Waiariki MB 261 (154 WAR 261) [pdf, 226 KB]

    ...of s 227A. 9 Rather, that ss 17(1)(b) and 17(2)(c) and (f) are indicators that the Māori Land Court is able to make its own pragmatic assessment as to whether rescission is appropriate. 10 [33] It is also settled law that trustees are not permitted to profit from their trusteeship and to do so is a breach of fiduciary duty. This applies regardless of whether or not the trustee’s actions result in a benefit for a beneficiary. 11 [34] The duty not to profit includes receipt...