Search Results

1. Singh v the Registrar of Immigration Advisers [2016] NZIACDT 25 (17 May 2016) [pdf, 140 KB]

   ...the fees were fair and reasonable; the Registrar said Mr Singh should use the adviser’s internal complaints procedure. She took account of, an offer of a partial refund, there had been no previous complaints against the adviser and he held a full licence since 2009 and there was evidence the adviser assessed options and he provided checklists. She said the fees were at the higher end of the scale, but not necessarily excessive. Further, that the adviser recognised there were deficiencies...

2. Baker v Paora - Te Tii Waitangi B3 (2015) 113 Taitokerau MB 31 (113 TTK 31) [pdf, 1 MB]

   113 Taitokerau MB 31 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20090015424 A20100004537 UNDER Section 231, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Te Tii Waitangi B3 BETWEEN MARYANNE BAKER Applicant A20150002058 UNDER Section 238, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Te Tii (Waitangi) B3 AND BETWEEN WAIRETI PAORA Applicant Hearing: 20 August 2015 (Heard at Kaik

3. Smitheram v Hanns [2010] NZWHT Wellington 24 [pdf, 483 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-101- 000048 [2010] NZWHT WELLINGTON 24 BETWEEN VIVIENNE SMITHERAM AND BERNARD MCBRIDE Claimants AND PETER HANNS TRADING AS HANNS BUILDERS & JOINERS First Respondent AND ROGER WALKER ARCHITECTS LTD Second Respondent AND WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL Third Respondent AND DION BARETA (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND K ROAD NO 1 LIMITED Fifth Respondent AND STOANZ LIMITED (Removed) Sixth Respondent AND HANNA

4. MLC-MAC - Retention & disposal appraisal report [pdf, 1 MB]

   RETENTION AND DISPOSAL APPRAISAL REPORT Te Kooti Whenua Māori Māori Land Court Te Kooti Pīra Māori Māori Appellate Court Court records Version 2.7a 17 May 2016 Date of Document: 17 May 2016 Name of public office: Māori Land Court and Māori Appellate Court, Ministry of Justice Te Kooti Whenua Māori me Te Kooti Pīra Māori, Te Tāhū o te Ture Public office contact: Leigh Nicholas,

5. Retention and disposal appraisal report - Māori Land Court and Māori Appellate Court [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   RETENTION AND DISPOSAL APPRAISAL REPORT Te Kooti Whenua Māori Māori Land Court Te Kooti Pīra Māori Māori Appellate Court Court records Version 2.7a 17 May 2016 Date of Document: 17 May 2016 Name of public office: Māori Land Court and Māori Appellate Court, Ministry of Justice Te Kooti Whenua Māori me Te Kooti Pīra Māori, Te Tāhū o te Ture Public office contact: Leigh Nicholas,

6. Slinger v Zhou [2015] NZIACDT 38 (15 April 2015) [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...engaged in the delivery of professional services to a degree that is far from universal in the regulation of professional service delivery. [56] It was foreseeable that some people who had formerly provided immigration services, and failed to gain a licence, would seek to have a licensed person “rubber stamp” their continuing activity in the industry. Unfortunately, this Tribunal’s work demonstrates that was a well-founded apprehension and an area where enforcement action has been...

7. Taueki v Horowhenua 11 Part Reservation Trust - Horowhenua 11 Lake Block [2016] Māori Appellate Court MB 184 (2016 APPEAL 184) [pdf, 328 KB]

   ...around 13 May 2013, the trustees served notice on Mr Taueki to vacate the block by 12 August 2013. [10] Following service of that notice, Judge Doogan issued a reserved decision on 9 August 2013 concluding that, at best, Mr Taueki had a bare licence to occupy the nursery, revocable at will on notice. 7 Judge Doogan also upheld the notice to vacate served on 13 May 2013. Despite that, for practical reasons, Judge Doogan extended an interim injunction already in place for a fur...

8. Eichelbaum v CAC 303 & White [2016] NZREADT 56 [pdf, 268 KB]

   ...unsatisfactory conduct. [92] We have considered whether we need to call for submissions as to penalty, and have concluded that it is not necessary to do so. In this respect we have taken into account that Ms White voluntarily suspended her licence as from 31 March 2013. The licence remains suspended until 31 March 2017. We have also taken into account that Mr Eichelbaum chose not to obtain a pre-purchase building report. [93] We have determined that appropriate course is to cen...

9. Muller v Yerman [2015] NZIACDT 88 (31 August 2015) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...has said indicates that it has predetermined what sanctions it will impose; only that Ms Yerman’s response to various factors may be important and that she needs to be aware the Tribunal will potentially make one of a range of orders affecting her licence. [22] The Tribunal has also said Ms Yerman’s proposal to defer the imposition of sanctions for some five months is unacceptable. It pointed out why, namely, that it is not satisfactory that she continue to offer professional service...

10. Mr E v REAA & Mr N [2013] NZREADT 27 [pdf, 39 KB]

    ...identified by X X. 2 [2] Mr E made a complaint to the REAA on 7 December 2010. He complained that Mr N’s conduct was such that it would have been reasonably regarded by agents of good standing as disgraceful. He requested Mr N’s licence be cancelled as he was “inherently dishonest and guilty of theft” of the database from X X. [3] The Complaints Assessment Committee (CAC) investigated the matter and on 3 October 2011 issued its decision which was that the cond...