Search Results

1. Heng v Yap [2014] NZIACDT 110 (10 October 2014) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...5,000 under the Malaysian Tribunal’s jurisdiction. [12] However, the Malaysian Tribunal equally does not have jurisdiction over New Zealand law; and particularly has no jurisdiction over professional standards imposed because of Mr Yap holding a licence as a New Zealand professional. [13] This decision is only concerned with professional responsibilities that arise under New Zealand law, which Mr Yap chose to accept to gain the benefits of New Zealand professional registration. There...

2. Naidu v Devi [2014] NZIACD 7 (05 February 2014 ) [pdf, 48 KB]

   ...Statement of Complaint; the central issue is an allegation that the adviser dishonesty conducted her practice by “signing off” documentation, while staff unlawfully provided immigration advice. Once her practice ended, due to the cancellation of her licence, the staff continued to provide immigration advice unlawfully. It appears the complaint is that the adviser did not assist with a “handover” of the complainant’s application to another licensed immigration adviser. [3] In ad...

3. Prasad v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 33 (19 March 2014) [pdf, 139 KB]

   ...concern, as the complainant had full and accurate advice, and instructed her not to. He instructed her instead to keep lodging applications or requests without addressing Immigration New Zealand’s concerns. [5] This Tribunal cancelled the adviser’s licence on the basis of an unrelated matter; the complainant says the adviser did not tell him or give advice regarding his options. Instead, he discovered what happened from his own research. [6] The issue for the Tribunal is whether the...

4. Māori Purposes Bill [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...State Highway 46, and State Highway 47”. 10. Clause 16 replaces s 4 of the Maori Purposes Act 1959 which provides that, unless an exception applies, a person must not enter or remain in or on any part of the Lake, unless that person holds an entry permit. The trustees of the Trust, or their agents, may issue entry permits authorising the holders to enter in and on the Lake. Section 18(1) of the Bill of Rights Act 11. Section 18(1) of the Bill of Rights Act affirms the right of peop...

5. CAC 10007 v Wallace [2012] NZREADT 34 [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...winery/restaurant business. The First Charge [3] In relation to the first charge, the complainants allege disgraceful conduct by the defendant in entering into an agreement for sale and purchase as vendor to them (as purchasers) of a car park licence at Princes Wharf, Quay Street, Auckland, and obtaining $25,000 as a deposit and part payment of the settlement balance and retaining those funds, in circumstances where (it is put - taking the view most favourable to the defendant) her...

6. Young people and alcohol: Some statistics to 2003 and 2004 on possible effects of lowering the purchase age [pdf, 512 KB]

   ...availability 17 2.1 Alcohol available for consumption 17 2.1.1 The volume of pure alcohol available for consumption per person aged 15 years and over 17 2.1.2 The volume of alcohol beverage of various types available for consumption 17 2.2 Liquor licences 19 2.3 Summary 20 3 Indicators of alcohol-related offending by minors 21 3.1 Minors drinking or possessing alcohol for consumption in a public place 21 3.1.1 Police statistics 21 3.1.2 Summary 22 3.2 Minors in restricte...

7. Saul v Ramos [2014] NZIACDT 114 (21 October 2014) [pdf, 132 KB]

   ...the Tribunal treats it that way. [12] The lack of care and the failure to document her engagement properly are significant matters also. http://www.justice.govt.nz/ 3 Training [13] I have considered cancelling Ms Ramos’ full licence and only permitting her to hold a provisional licence and practice under supervision. However, my view of the circumstances in which the unauthorised use of funds occurred, do not make such an order necessary. Further, the Registrar has...

8. CAC10003 v Kumandan [2013] NZREADT 28 [pdf, 46 KB]

   ...the papers PENALTY DECISION [1] This penalty decision is back before the Tribunal as a result of an appeal by Mr Kumandan of the Tribunal’s decision of April 2012 and its penalty decision dated 12 June 2012 cancelling Mr Kumandan’s licence. [2] The Tribunal has seen the decision of Justice Katz dated 19 December 2012 which sets out her decision on Mr Kumandan’s appeal. At paragraph 74 she found that the Tribunal misdirected itself as to the correct interpretation of s...

9. INZ (Greathead) v Ortiz [2019] NZIACDT 69 (7 October 2019) Sanctions [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...briefly summarised here. [5] Ms Maria Socorro Angela (Anji) Ortiz was a licensed immigration adviser, based in Christchurch. She was a director and shareholder of NZ Lifeways Group Ltd, trading under the name, NZ Lifeways Immigration. Ms Ortiz’s licence had been suspended by the Tribunal on 10 September 2018, following criminal charges laid in the District Court. As she was convicted, the Registrar refused to renew her licence on 21 June 2019. [6] The complaint concerned a clie...

10. 2025 NZPSPLA 038.pdf [pdf, 141 KB]

    ...[3] As part of the process, the complaint was referred to the Complaints, Investigation and Prosecution Unit (CIPU) for investigation and possible prosecution. 1 Pursuant to section 36(3) of the Act if an application for renewal of a licence is made before the expiry of the licence, the licence continues in force until the application for renewal is determined. 2 [4] CIPU found,2 summarised: [i] Secpro and Mr Tautali have breached section 45(1) of the Act...