Search Results

1. [2018] NZEnvC 190 Jacks Point v Queesntown Lakes District Council [pdf, 7.1 MB]

   ...emphasis).'· Further, the court determined that the relevant s274 parties were "not entitled to be heard on their wish for a requirement for their approval to dispensing with notification of resource consent applications for building above the permitted height limit" (my emphasis).'9 [34] Section 274 has not materially changed since Beasley was decided. It was an oral decision of then Principal Environment Judge Sheppard and concerned whether a s274 party could...

2. Canterbury / Westland Standards Committee 3 v Johnson [2018] NZLCDT 5 [pdf, 464 KB]

   ...because he had intended to find and rectify the errors, that there was no intention to mislead. That is a distortion of his obligation. [131] As set out in Mr Waalkens’ Closing, the categories of default are as follows: (a) Client balances were permitted to go into debit; (b) Large client balances were not put in interest bearing deposit; (c) The float account was overdrawn; (d) Journal entries were not maintained from September 2014 and certain other transfers were not recorde...

3. [2023] NZEnvC 223 MacFarlane Investments Ltd v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 490 KB]

   ...additional two, requiring a take of 54 m2. The design for this option was based upon a 5 m wide footpath provided through the intersection, with a right-turn limit line on Man Street set as close to behind the pedestrian cross walk as design standards permits “… enabling greater right turn capacity and improved intersection efficiency”. Decision on the NOR and associated consents [44] The panel made a decision to confirm the NOR and granted the associated resource consents...

4. Directory of Official Information J-L [pdf, 792 KB]

   ...• leveraging the company’s core competencies by entering into long-term leasing of land for dairy and sheep and beef farming • optimising the company’s genetic capability by marketing its genetically superior sheep, beef and deer • to permit wind farming on its properties as an adjunct to its core farming business and where appropriate, for the purpose of supplying primarily its own energy needs, to develop, operate and own small scale wind turbines on its properties, whether...

5. [2024] NZEnvC 224 Gisborne District Council v Barraclough [pdf, 6.1 MB]

   ...\ Please refer attached stabilization plan on Appendix B. CIVIL ASSIST |Site Stabilization Plan — Part 01 | Fearless Star Ltd. Th \ NZ Topmost DEB The topmost decanting earth bund at the spill location must be elevated further without permitting water to overtop it and enter the western valley. Water will naturally flow over the protected spillway to the east. Ridge Track At the base of the ridge track, water should be diverted towards the western valley using a cutoff dr...

6. Regulatory Impact Statement: Changing name suppression settings in sexual violence cases [pdf, 350 KB]

   ...open justice. 14. The court can restrict the sharing of information relevant to criminal proceedings through suppression orders. The main legislative settings for suppression orders are set out in the Criminal Procedure Act 2011 (the CPA), which permit interim and 4 New Zealand Law Commission (2015), The Justice Response to Victims of Sexual Violence: Criminal Trials and Alternative Processes [NZLC R136]. Available at: https://www.lawcom.govt.nz/our-work/alternative-models-for- proc...

7. [2024] NZEmpC 84 E Tū Inc v Singh [pdf, 378 KB]

   ...“acting in support of an employer (HVF)”. employment and the policies under which he carried out his work were relevant. As the policies make clear, there is flexibility of approach as to hours worked and private use of E tū vehicles is permitted in some circumstances, as Ms Mackintosh accepted in cross-examination. The policies were not considered during the disciplinary process. [73] On the use of an E tū phone and email for non-E tū business, Mr Singh’s init...

8. Phase II Anti-money laundering reforms - Business Compliance Impacts [pdf, 495 KB]

   ...statements or representations whatsoever concerning the report, and the reader acknowledges that it may not rely on any such statements or representations made or information contained in the report. 4. The reader agrees that, to the maximum extent permitted by law, Deloitte, its partners, principals, employees and agents exclude and disclaim all liability (including without limitation, in contract, in tort including in negligence, or under any enactment), and shall not be liable...

9. Foubister v Accident Compensation Corporation (Personal injury/causation) [2025] NZACC 003 (6 January 2025) [pdf, 372 KB]

   ...to be on his feet to perform such tasks and reported that after around 1.5 hours maximum he needed to leave the work area and go and sit in the café, due to significantly exacerbated low back and right leg discomfort/pain symptoms that did not permit him to remain standing or walking any longer. It was apparent to Ms Holmes that Mr Foubister was not managing well back at work even on light duties due to significantly high levels of low back and right leg radicular discomfort/pain....

10. [2025] NZLCDT 18 National Standards Committee 2 v ZKA (24 March 2025) [pdf, 295 KB]

    ...incorporated law firm is guilty of misconduct if, at a time when he or she or it is providing regulated services, and without the consent of the High Court or of the Disciplinary Tribunal, the lawyer or incorporated law firm knowingly employs, or permits to act as a clerk or otherwise, in relation to the provision of regulated services, any person who, to the knowledge of the lawyer or incorporated law firm,— (a) is under suspension from practice as a barrister or as a solicitor or as...